Not really. I have been awarded the title of Master Instructor, and to my way of thinking, that just means I'm an advanced student.
Point well taken. "advanced student" I like this very much. I have met "masters" but only a small few I would consider true advanced practitioners. To me a Master is the person that not only has taken what he has learned to the peak of perfection, but is able to read between the lines of what he has learned and in a meaningful way is able to bring those that are ready, to the next level of understanding.
I agree with this.A few thoughts on this.
In terms of modern (within the past century) martial arts, these are expressed in the tenets of more than one art. But martial arts or no, they are good qualities to have regardless of the field of study. Ever notice how top level athletes who display these qualities are accorded greater respect than similarly skilled athletes who are self important?
I disagree with this, not because I think that you're wrong, but because I think you're using the term "master" in a way that goes beyond what the term actually defines. There definitely are people who hold the title who really don't understand it and who hold themselves up as being some kind Shaw Brothers kung fu movie master. These people paint themselves into a corner by espousing their skill and knowledge and by asking for unquestioning loyalty and obedience. This is, of course, to mask any shortcomings.
Such a person may actually be a master, but not any master that you or I would want to study under
Well said Daniel, I do feel that a master goes beyond physical ability and is able to teach and past down what they know in such a way that everyone can benefit and grow in understanding that goes beyond simple doing.......