Makalakumu, are you against the death penalty for everyone, including john wayne gacy and Adolf eichman, or just for the ones where there isn't complete evidence of guilt?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Makalakumu, are you against the death penalty for everyone, including john wayne gacy and Adolf eichman, or just for the ones where there isn't complete evidence of guilt?
Why give them a last meal of any kind? It's not like they're going to get a chance to digest it.
Yeah, and everyone really enjoys digesting a meal most of all-never mind the tasting and eating.....
I mean, I get you, it's a waste of food, but it's like I said upthread-this has traditionally been done so that the people responsible for the execution can hang onto their humanity. It's not for the prisoner at all............
.........which explains why this is happening in Texas, of course.
Then why not get him a hooker?
Then why not get him a hooker?
Proving people are monsters is the issue. It's just an opinion.
Also, when you give the State the power to take life and combine it with the above, the stage is set for terror.
I do see your point. However, "terror" is real. It's what these monsters do. I'm not talking about ordinary crime here, I'm talking pure horror. The issue of monsters is real. I could copy many of the case files I have, but I wouldn't blame anyone from banning me from this forum for posting pure, obscene horror if I did so. What we do is take these monsters and spend millions of dollars on them, not on their victims or victims families, not on the poor and needy, but on them. We threaten our own species but our unwillingness to protect it.
True. We spend way too much money, but not for the reasons that most people think. At every step in the creation of a "monster" there was an abrogation of personal responsibility. Killing the "monster" is an abrogation of personal responsibility.
In my moral universe, The Non-Aggression Principle is violated by the Death Penalty. In a free society we probably wouldn't kill people who have taken life unless it was directly in self defense.
i guess that depends on the manner in which it is broken... does it take away more lives to have it exist than it takes away to destroy it? Who is qualified to determine the value of one versus many? Is each life equal to each other life?How I wish I could glimpse, in four hundred years, what people then will say of these things happening now.
Who am I to judge when a human needs to be put down like a dog? I know broken brains exist and I know that various agents in society break brains. At some point these brains cannot be fixed. What's wrong with a mental institution, or voluntary suicide? Does a human with a broken brain have a right to life?
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
Said far more gracefully than I could have... thanks, Gran...