dancingalone
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 5,322
- Reaction score
- 281
What I do believe is that where legislation is concerned, the President has very little direct control over what ends up on his desk next to the ceremonial pen.
I don't necessarily buy that. Powerful and influential presidents can get what they want. See FDR. See Teddy Roosevelt. Even see Ronald Reagan to an extent. Obama had majorities in both houses of Congress. If he failed to get a bill in the shape he wanted, that falls on his lap too.
And so, to give Congress a pass on a product they have created is simplistic.
I'm not giving them a pass on this. Far from it.
And as I've said, even calling it Obamacare is a nod to partisanship and absolves the members of Congress of their part in the process, both Democrat and Republican.
The same is true for all legislation. Another good example is the Patriot Act, a deplorable piece of flawed legislation. While Bush 43 certainly bears some of the responsibility, the lion's share falls, in my opinion, squarely on Congress. They drafted the bloody bill and passed it through both the House and the Senate.
Bob Hubbard said, "I don't blame him. I blame all of them." I agree with this, but as I said before, it rings hollow in light of the lambasting of Obama that immediately precedes it.
You guys. I'm not saying anything radical here. In fact, I would bet I'm not saying anything that hasn't been said by you guys yourselves in other threads on other bills.
I don't really see what the big deal here is. No one is forgetting about Congress' role in this. Obama as the president gets saddled with a big part of the burden and blame. It comes along with the bully pulpit and it's fair considering he chose to make healthcare 'reform' the centerpiece of his first two years in office. He SHOULD get some of the backlash. It's well deserved.