Once again, I think we're getting mixed up here. "Sculpting" in order to be successful in body building competitions can actually lead to an illusion of health that isn't there. Personally, I don't doubt that many of the training techniques are very good. It's the goal that's suspect... the body image.
http://www.recipezaar.com/members/home/58382/Joe.jpg
This guy is a body builder. Joe the body builder. I just picked him out of a bing image list because he doesn't look completely out of sorts. We can all find images that are grotesque exaggarations, but I think this guy represents what many would call a "balanced" body building ideal. Not completely over the top.
http://www.born2bbig.com/viewpic.php?im=images/profilepics/1151469653.jpg
That's randy couture. Both are big guys. Both lift weights, work a lot of cardio, have a low BF% and are, in their own ways, sculpting a physique. Who do you think is stronger? I'd put my money on Randy Couture for functional strength. His core is so much more developed, so while his arms and legs aren't as big, his body is much, much stronger through the core. This makes couture look thicker through the middle, which isn't desirable in a body building competition.
Again, I'm not disagreeing with Repz or Draven. I really think we're all saying the same things, just from two different directions, and we're getting hung up on terms like "bodybuilding" and "sculpting". Just to make it clear where I'm at once again, I think of bodybuilding as the sport... sort of like MMA is the sport.