(Did I mention I don't always take it 100% seriously? There's a few of us that'll play about a bit.)
As tactically important, dangerous, serious, whatever - if you take things too seriously mentally, you're f'd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(Did I mention I don't always take it 100% seriously? There's a few of us that'll play about a bit.)
None that I know of. It's mostly an expression.
However once you start moving backwards and your opponent starts following and pressing with strikes, you'll probably find yourself literally on your heels after a couple steps, regardless of who taught you what.
This is why boxers, kickboxers and MMA fighters(and anyone else that includes sparring with contact in their curriculum) will teach you to angle out rather than retreat backwards.
They are only wrong training if you are training for combat. They are perfectly valid training for sport context. Again, not everyone trains for defensive/combat usage. If someone is training specifically for high school wrestling (which a lot of kids in the US do), then assuming your opponent won't punch your head is a valid assumption - it's against the rules. That sport context doesn't have to negatively affect those of us who train for self-defense. I can still pick up some useful techniques and principles from competition wrestling, though I have to filter them through the context I train for. So I might actually train to do the technique in a way that is "wrong" for their context (exposes a leg more to takedowns, for instance) but is more "right" for my context (protects my head from punches).
The technique itself is "combat ready" the only variance should be the power that is put into applying it. The mindset shouldn't have any baring on the technique itself. The mindset will have baring on the power that is put into a technique. For example, a jab in point sparring is not the same power as a jab in a street fight or full contact. It's the same dangerous technique but not the same power.
How things change. During the brief time I studied TKD, we were taught to always move with maximum power. It was sort of a mantra with Mr. Rhee to the effect; "Always move with maximum power, always seek a new maximum." We were also taught to be able to strike where we intended.
Have you sparred with gloves before? If it's part of your routine just try it. Have your partner storm you with a flurry and move straight backwards. You'll find it difficult to be on your toes, and difficult to do much but cover up. Then reverse the situation. You'll find it easier to land. It's just physics.I've been seeing that answer a lot in this thread. I sorry, but to me it sounds a little lame (no pun intended). I don't think it is an expression since it is a possible outcome for a lack of training or experience. YMMV.
The problem with this is that it results in too many injuries. And difficulty finding sparring partners. Solid contact, yes. Every possible bit of power I can deliver? No. I like the people I spar with.
any problem with this. Do a backflip with a double twist if you like. But you shouldn't get points. Unless it's a gymnastics competition
Have you sparred with gloves before? If it's part of your routine just try it. Have your partner storm you with a flurry and move straight backwards. You'll find it difficult to be on your toes, and difficult to do much but cover up. Then reverse the situation. You'll find it easier to land. It's just physics.
Or unless you flog the guy with it.
Nope. No backflip, and no double twist. Nice try though..........
Yes, I agree being 'on your heels' is unequivocally bad. This is why it's important to practice angling out rather than retreating straight backwards. It's an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure situation. Bad position is better avoided than mitigatedNever did spar with gloves. It wasn't done back then. When I studied TKD, my recollection is that nobody would retreat more than two steps without a counter attack. And retreat or not, if anyone began ending up on their heels, there would be some retraining.
The term I used to use was “martial sport”. I don’t now, because there’s too much overlap and difficulty in defining the difference. But any combat system can be turned into a game/sport. The rules should be based on the purpose of the game. If the point is to train fighting ability, rules should favor combat-effective techniques and strategies. If the point is fitness, the rules should favor stamina and perhaps strength. If the point is speed, the rules should favor speed (possibly punishing power by exclusion). If the point is fun and/or entertainment, the rules probably ought to favor flashy moves.I keep trying to wrap my head around a martial art that isn't a martial art, even though it is supposedly based on a martial art. I keep trying to think it out but my head starts hurting.
Understood. However, we were required to keep a certain distance. Two or three inches from a practice opponent until we got more consistency in striking where we should. Even at green belt I wasn't much closer tht 1 1/2 inches in strikes, and more space in kicks. But there was a constant, if slow, improvement.
Personally, I would rather train with accurate distance but with reduced power (when the target is another person instead of a pad) instead of full power but extended distance. In an adrenaline situation, I trust myself to dial up the power more than I trust myself to adjust distance.
Totally agree that sparring with both proper distance and full power can lead to an injury rate that just doesn't work for a lot of people beyond 30 years of age. I don't mind contact, I don't mind bruises, but actual injuries mean no training, and that's bad. Anecdote time: at a tournament this weekend, a young strong guy went harder than I interpret "light contact" to be with his kicks, and dislocated my shoulder when I blocked a kick aimed for my head. I'm now out of practice for at least a week or two until it heals.
It's an expression look it up.I've been seeing that answer a lot in this thread. I sorry, but to me it sounds a little lame (no pun intended). I don't think it is an expression since it is a possible outcome for a lack of training or experience. YMMV.
sorry to hear that. Not being able to practice due to an injury sucks.Personally, I would rather train with accurate distance but with reduced power (when the target is another person instead of a pad) instead of full power but extended distance. In an adrenaline situation, I trust myself to dial up the power more than I trust myself to adjust distance.
Totally agree that sparring with both proper distance and full power can lead to an injury rate that just doesn't work for a lot of people beyond 30 years of age. I don't mind contact, I don't mind bruises, but actual injuries mean no training, and that's bad. Anecdote time: at a tournament this weekend, a young strong guy went harder than I interpret "light contact" to be with his kicks, and dislocated my shoulder when I blocked a kick aimed for my head. I'm now out of practice for at least a week or two until it heals.
And while they're eating it, sucker punch them?