Nope i just know history...taiji is lost art long time ago..today is random upgraded style.I think you are just a troll.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope i just know history...taiji is lost art long time ago..today is random upgraded style.I think you are just a troll.
Only 1 tansao in form. But why 3 fuk sao ?
If you do something several times, it is probably because it is important. The fook sao must be properly structured with the elbow in and at the centerline so the proper form is critical because of how important the fook sao is for controlling the centerline. Think of how easy a fook sao could turn into a fist, and how it can also prevent an opponent striking you with a joot sao and leaves you a clean target.Only 1 tansao in form. But why 3 fuk sao
All the lineages are real, what kind of question is that? Some of his students evolved it a bit such as Wong Shun Leung who added kicks but in general, you are just learning the alphabet from different teachers who were students of the same headmaster. As you know, handwriting can vary here and there, even when taught by the same teacher.so which yip man style is the real one?
My 9 lives cat might be able to pull that off lol.What do you mean? Are you saying I have to learn all versions of Yip Man wing chun in order to have real wing chun?
good catch.I'm guessing from the way you spelled it (wing tsun) that you are in the Leung Ting lineage(?)
whoa there cowboy. If you read the messages previous to my question in the thread, you would see I was asking SifuBoza based on statements he made on the matter. I wasnt saying there is a 'real' yip man style.All the lineages are real, what kind of question is that? Some of his students evolved it a bit such as Wong Shun Leung who added kicks but in general, you are just learning the alphabet from different teachers who were students of the same headmaster. As you know, handwriting can vary here and there, even when taught by the same teacher.
Just go a class and you'll see that the sihing are not all identical in their application.
As Sifu says (who was trained by Ip Man's son Ip Ching): "we teach you the alphabet and you write your story". It's not combo's 1-10.
Ain't a cowboy but you can definitely say "whoa tiger" lol. I saw a bit of that exchange but I'll be happy to take it back from your direction if I have misunderstood or saw it the wrong way.whoa there cowboy. If you read the messages previous to my question in the thread, you would see I was asking SifuBoza based on statements he made on the matter. I wasnt saying there is a 'real' yip man style.
A couple major reasons.Can someone explain to me why some movements are repeated in the first form?
Can someone explain to me why some movements are repeated in the first form?
What is its purpose? Huen sau's are everywhere in all the forms. I'm curious to know your thoughts about this.
I have to agree here, the huen sao is an excellent technique for both gaining leverage as well as escaping holds that will result in large openings, not to mention huen sao to lop sao. Its not just a wrist exercise though it does condition your brain and wrist on applying the technique.Hmmm...only one Tan sau? What version or lineage are you? I've never heard of the first form only containing one Tan sau.
Afrer seeing this again, silly me I forgot to add the bong sao to tan sao!If you do something several times, it is probably because it is important. The fook sao must be properly structured with the elbow in and at the centerline so the proper form is critical because of how important the fook sao is for controlling the centerline. Think of how easy a fook sao could turn into a fist, and how it can also prevent an opponent striking you with a joot sao and leaves you a clean target.
Only 1 tan sao in SLT? Lemme think...actually I counted 4 tan sao's in SLT:
-The 2nd move goes through a cross-armed partial double tan sao when coming up from the first movement
-After the chung kuen
-After the pak sao/chang geng
-The 1st tan sao after the pak sao/chang-geng goes to gum sao then back to tan sao
BTW Chum Kiu say 'sup...8 double tan sao, 6 upward tan sao, 12 bong sao with 6 of them going from bong sao to tan sao!
Probably important.
Because they deserve general answers because of the nature of the of the question from the recievers end.When talking about
- boxing, people will address offense skill such as jab, cross, hook, uppercut, overhand, ...
- TKD, people will address offense skill such as front kick, side kick, roundhouse kick, hook kick, ...
- Judo, people will address offense skill such as hip throw, leg lift, front cut, inner hook, ...
- WC, people will address defense skill such as Tan Shou, Fu Shou, Bong Shou, ...
Why?
When a WC guy lands his fist on his opponent's face, he is not using Tan, Fu, or Bong.Because they deserve general answers because of the nature of the of the question from the recievers end.
Some people psychology and psych bearings work...because they run a meritocracy...
Other ppl could care less and just generally roll with the punches
Like the question you just asked
It is because they are a part of the system and many people, especially when first starting probably will not grasp the concepts of what they are doing or the application. It is a very unique art.When talking about
- boxing, people will address offense skill such as jab, cross, hook, uppercut, overhand, ...
- TKD, people will address offense skill such as front kick, side kick, roundhouse kick, hook kick, ...
- Judo, people will address offense skill such as hip throw, leg lift, front cut, inner hook, ...
- WC, people will address defense skill such as Tan Shou, Fu Shou, Bong Shou, ...
Why?
When talking about
- WC, people will address defense skill such as Tan Shou, Fu Shou, Bong Shou, ...
Why?
When a WC guy lands his fist on his opponent's face, he is not using Tan, Fu, or Bong.
The beauty of it is that they can be both. The tan sao is meant to control the outside line, inside the opponent's arm. If you put some forward motion into it and land your elbow or just above where the big bone runs down your forearm hard into your opponent's bicep from an incoming strike, it will hurt like hell and can weaken their arm. Also, since we punch/strike with our other arm at the same time, the tan sao arm is in a prime position to throw a follow up strike.I'm not sure.
But IMO it's a mindset that traces back to how one was trained. When I think of those terms you mentioned, to me those are linked to offensive, not defensive.
Agree. You may and likely would be using either of the techniques simultaneously with a punch.This is a narrow-minded statement.