I belong to a Facebook group called "Bruce Tegner's Jukado:Modernized Jujitsu System." Mainly because I remember seeing his little booklets on various martial arts at the checkout stands of every grocery store when I was a child (I'm 63 now). The group seemed to have gone missing, and Facebook sent me an automated message and asked me if I wanted to be the admin. Failing that, the group would be archived. So I said yes. I don't know why.
However, I recently came across a copy of Tegner's booklet on Jukado, and purchased it on impulse. It hasn't arrived yet, but in the meantime, I found a copy online at Archive.org as well:
I started reading his introduction, and I realized that I never really understood what he was trying to do with Jukado. Tegner was a judo player, and I guess a pretty good one from back in the day, or at least that's what I hear. He also trained in various other martial arts, to what extent I do not know. There's really not a lot of information out there about him, although he was a contemporary of early famous martial artists like Gene LeBell, whom he apparently knew.
So from what I am gathering, Tegner was interested in teaching self-defense to average everyday people, only not in a dojo and not in a traditional way. His belief appears to have been that traditional teaching was as unimportant for self-defense purposes as the tea ceremony is for making tea. Certainly, a tea ceremony produces tea, but the tea is no longer the point of the exercise; it's the ceremony that matters. While I do understand that, I'm not sure I agree with it.
I do agree that for pure self-defense (and not sport, not tradition, not esoteric technique), it is possible to teach a person to defend themselves reasonably well in a fairly short period of time, and that doesn't require belts or bowing or even a dojo for that matter. One might say Tegner's beliefs predated MMA and training such as Krav Maga, etc.
I am not sure what I am going to do yet, but I am thinking of examining his book through the eyes of a semi-experienced karate student and part-time instructor. I am far from an expert, but over time I believe I've developed a reasonable eye for effective technique and I've been exposed to many types of martial arts besides my own (isshinryu, 3rd dan).
So we'll see where this goes. But I thought I'd introduce the topic here. I know Tegner has been discussed before, but I wanted to start from scratch with a new thread. Feel free to join in.
However, I recently came across a copy of Tegner's booklet on Jukado, and purchased it on impulse. It hasn't arrived yet, but in the meantime, I found a copy online at Archive.org as well:
Jukado Self Defense Bruce Tegner : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Self-Defense
archive.org
I started reading his introduction, and I realized that I never really understood what he was trying to do with Jukado. Tegner was a judo player, and I guess a pretty good one from back in the day, or at least that's what I hear. He also trained in various other martial arts, to what extent I do not know. There's really not a lot of information out there about him, although he was a contemporary of early famous martial artists like Gene LeBell, whom he apparently knew.
So from what I am gathering, Tegner was interested in teaching self-defense to average everyday people, only not in a dojo and not in a traditional way. His belief appears to have been that traditional teaching was as unimportant for self-defense purposes as the tea ceremony is for making tea. Certainly, a tea ceremony produces tea, but the tea is no longer the point of the exercise; it's the ceremony that matters. While I do understand that, I'm not sure I agree with it.
I do agree that for pure self-defense (and not sport, not tradition, not esoteric technique), it is possible to teach a person to defend themselves reasonably well in a fairly short period of time, and that doesn't require belts or bowing or even a dojo for that matter. One might say Tegner's beliefs predated MMA and training such as Krav Maga, etc.
I am not sure what I am going to do yet, but I am thinking of examining his book through the eyes of a semi-experienced karate student and part-time instructor. I am far from an expert, but over time I believe I've developed a reasonable eye for effective technique and I've been exposed to many types of martial arts besides my own (isshinryu, 3rd dan).
So we'll see where this goes. But I thought I'd introduce the topic here. I know Tegner has been discussed before, but I wanted to start from scratch with a new thread. Feel free to join in.