For the sake of people without styles that rank would it be agreeable that
less that one year = Beginner
one to three years = Intermidiate
three to five years = Advanced
five to seven years = 1st Black
seven to ten years = 2nd Black
ten to thirteen years = 3rd Black
thirteen to sixteen = 4th Black
sixteen to Twenty = 5th or 6th Black
Twenty to twenty-five = 7th or 8th Black
twenty five and up = 9th or 10th Black
Heh well in that case I'm a 10th dan aren't I? (NOT!) Seeing how I've been doing MA for longer than I've been caving (which is 33+ years)... This is unrealistic in the sense that each art is different in the ranking system. Even those without rank it may take longer to learn one technique over the other. Not to mention there are those who take sometimes three or five years hiatus between lessons. If by that you meant continually... it will still vary from art to art and thus the chart (above) can't be used as an accurate or even a theoretical model.
chufeng said:I guess this poll is OK...but why differentiate above third dan???
With the exception of self-promoted folks, and Belt-mill black belts, anyone above third dan should be able to provide you all with plenty of good information...then again, those most likely to respond with lofty rank are exactly those who you should probably be most leary of...
chufeng, while there are those who self-promote, several of the higher ranking belts here, as far as I know above 5th are legit. There are kenpoists here who can verify via linage their dans.
MT has striven to maintain integrity among it's members as far as personal (real-life) ranks. It helps maintain the overall integrity of the forum. I myself have been and probably always will consider myself as a permanent white belt. :asian: