The environmental variables, the manner in which the aggressor initiates, the verbal engagement with the aggressor, the technique against the knife, the target placement with the knife, the fact that the aggressor pretty much immediately drops after being "stabbed" in the armpit/shoulder/neck/back of neck, the interaction with the bystander, and the manner of conversation with the "police"--are not theoretical.
You are just on a campaign to disprove RBSD in whatever way possible, like a lawyer, and I don't know why.
Survive, so I assume you mean just give the car up. Which is the only sane answer. Why then do you think Tyson is ill-equipped for that.
I was going from his assertion that someone specially trained would fare better than Mike Tyson. That seems to imply more than just survival, since Iton Mike could probably give his car up as easily as I could.
That assumes any given person knows someone trained or experienced enough to be trusted with that situation. Most don’t.
I mean..this is effectively a thread on tactical training, which is a field with sub-disciplines. The average person doesn’t even know how to indentify and categorize pre-predation behaviors in the moment.
Some people have lived very comfortable lives, and the thought wouldn’t cross their mind.
He doesn’t. Drop Bear was doing the “MMA or bah” speach, and he was pointing out that pro-level boxing skills aren’t necessarily going to help you in this situation.
This is probably a great weapons disarm class. That's part of the problem though, it leaves the student feeling that to survive the carjacking, I need to wrestle over a loaded gun. It's good skill to have(you might needed it in a carjacking), but that's not the same thing as teaching realistically how to survive a carjacking. You are actually teaching people to escalate an economic crime, into a situation where you get shot.
Right, while any idiot can just give up his car, there can be a lot more to it than that. Again, different skill set.
It already has—CCTV, phone cameras, hospital records, law enforcement records, military records.
I was always taught to not try anything, until I there were cues I wasn’t getting out alive.
I agree. Also keep in mind that clue is hard to nail down. It might be simply prior knowledge, leading up to the weapon being presented.
Which is why it is essential to be taught accordingly by qualified instructors. I was always taught:
Because the only instances in which lethal weapons are tested the way you desire, is in street fights, gang turf wars, counter-abduction, law enforcement raids, war, and counter-terrorism. These incidents are recorded, and debriefed on, so the relevant parties learn from them.
I would be careful with B. and C.
