Axiom
Black Belt
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
- Messages
- 615
- Reaction score
- 19
Really? or perhaps it's the sign of people who are thrifty and/or don't want to use wood to help the environment.
Sounds far-fetched.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? or perhaps it's the sign of people who are thrifty and/or don't want to use wood to help the environment.
Those boards can be temperamental sometimes, I've seen old ones that either break with a tap, or are way tougher to break then their color/thickness suggestsAs I already mentioned, the board wasn't wood, it was one of those you piece together after breaking it (another sign of a Mcdojo). And they did make several adjustments for her with no improvement in her performance.
yeah, it's not like wood grows on trees! Hahahahah... err.. yeah...Really? or perhaps it's the sign of people who are thrifty and/or don't want to use wood to help the environment. Get a grip man, you far too judgemental without any reasons to be.
In a small school I feel it is easier for a student to develop a meaningful student-teacher relationship with the teacher, which can translate into better instruction. The teacher really knows the students progress and ability.You know, that's actually a great question. The school I attend is relatively large, with nearly 600 students in total (if you count the after-care programs and the summer camp programs, along with the conventional evening taekwondo classes). We have 4 schools here in the US but we're affiliated with about a hundred schools over in South Korea (the "MBA" franchise in South Korea). Our busiest class during the week is the Wednesday evening "All Belts" class in which we can have as many as 80 students in a class. (Though a class size of 30ish is more typical for us.) During our busy classes, the use of belts certainly helps us divide into groups quickly for curriculum practice.
Being a large schools offers us some advantages:
Of course a number of things on that list fall outside the core objective of having "good taekwondo". But the question I'm rolling-around in my mind is: do smaller schools inherently have an easier time of achieving good taekwondo? I'm inclined to think that being small would present its own unique set of challenges, when it comes to having "good taekwondo".
- Of course there's the obvious economic advantages: the economies of scale. We can afford to do things like host big regional tournaments by virtue of our size (the D.C. TKD Open & Kukkiwon Cup is coming up soon) or even have large production runs of our own internal brand of uniforms (네이버 지도).
- We're large enough to have a number of "special teams" that help with longer-term student retention, by maintaining students' interest past black-belt (a demo team, leadership team, competition team, tkd video club, etc.)
- We have a "deep bench" of instructors, so a big chunk of the school can go away (like, to a tournament) while still leaving a good-sized cadre of instructors at home to carry on.
- Our adult population (both practitioners and parents) is so large that we also have a "deep bench" of specialized skills we can draw upon (IT people, EMTs, photographers, etc.) to support our many projects.
- During black-belt testing, our size makes it fairly easy for us to find good panels of outside masters to serve as our judges.
- And of course the large size results in a very social dojang - peopled tend to make many new friends at our school.
Those boards can be temperamental sometimes, I've seen old ones that either break with a tap, or are way tougher to break then their color/thickness suggests
And thank you for that opinion too.Except that when you call them a waste and a distraction, you are saying they serve no useful purpose, and those of us who use them are distracted by them. I've seen little to support that conclusion.
Sounds far-fetched.
I have broken them so hard that the two people holding dropped it to the ground,
Of course you did.
I bet they were really impressed.It wasn't even for a grading. I had a bad day and asked the instructor to get me one and had the steoridhead and another dude hold it. Nobody said a word after that
There's a black belt who get's criticised every single pattern performance for lacking power, and rightly so. He breaks the boards effortlessly. I have broken them so hard that the two people holding dropped it to the ground, and one of those guys is a steoridhead who always has his shirt off in the locker room until the last second.
It wasn't even for a grading. I had a bad day and asked the instructor to get me one and had the steoridhead and another dude hold it. Nobody said a word after that
Also, if only mcdojos have those boards, and your dojo breaks those boards, wouldn't that mean you train at a mcdojo?
What do either of these have to do with the boards being temperamental?
I bet they were really impressed.
So the testing is a mcdojos, the test for power generation is a mcdojo and the black belts are products of a mcdojo. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...Look at you, putting two and two together The level of intensity during class is equal to or better than other schools. It's the level of rigor in testing which is Mcdojo on acid.
I have no clue what girl you're talking about. I would bet in that case it wasn't the board, but my statement was that the boards can be temperamental. Not whatever person you now have it in your head to use to anecdotally probe your point.What a coincidence they only exhibited that for the particular girl who could break them fine with a kick, but not with her fist. That sure was a quick change!
So the testing is a mcdojos, the test for power generation is a mcdojo and the black belts are products of a mcdojo. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
.
I have a quick question. Is the trouble with the term "test?" I get the impression that many schools call them tests when they are really "demonstrations." As I mentioned in other, similar threads, and earlier in this one, it all works better when everything is consistent. But as Tony points out, a disconnect between the "test" and the training is not uncommon. If it bothers you too much, just consider the "tests" to be a public demonstration/celebration of achievement that has already been vetted in training by the instructors.Look at you, putting two and two together The level of intensity during class is equal to or better than other schools. It's the level of rigor in testing which is Mcdojo on acid.
did they swoon?Sure looked like it.
I have no clue what girl you're talking about.