I have been in both at various times in my career. At least 4 large Associations, or 5, or 7 if you count Shotokan and Taekwondo.
I definitly opt for the one that includes it's instructors as part of the Family. The higher the heads of any organization gets, the more insulated they are by the group they are the most familiar with, i.e. those senior instructors that have been with them, in a close decision making role, for the longest. We are all more comfortable with the people we have known the longest, but you have to consider the number of Shodans come and gone, do we get invested in them (if we are a 8th, 9th, 10th?) Nidans, there are still hundreds, if not thousands over the last 40 years of promotions, many by people you have not seen in years. Should they know every 3rd degree, probably when the organization was smaller, they did. You do seminars, camps, tests, every weekend, for 30 or 40 years and see how close you feel to who?
I am not defending ... I DO NOT LIKE IT AT ALL!!! But a certain amount of autonomy is given up in "joining" together in a closer group. Does the one organizing it get more prestige, power or influence? Would others be threatened or have to give up some of their own little ways of doing things if you came together.
I know if you brought a unified Texas group to Mr. Tracy, you personally would get a lot more attention ... that is just the way it works.
It gets lonely out there doesn't it ... but the flip side is that you don't have anyone micromanaging or taking money out of your pocket. It is all trade offs to me. I personally have had to make some adjustments in my perceptions and attitudes in changing associations over the years.
YUK!
Oss,
-Michael:soapbox: