What "both sides"? You are saying you dont doubt that this is an assault 3, but you dont believe this cop tackled him? What is the issue here? An assault on an LEO is an assault. Is this a "whos tougher" thing? Somebody apparently got him in cuffs. Penns attorney is saying his client "pushed" the officer, didnt punch him. So apparently Penn isnt trying to deny laying hands on the Cop.
Dont take offense, but as to the "I know", "Ive met", "I hang around with" stuff. I may know a SEAL, but it doesnt give me any more knowledge of naval special warfare than another guy. I appreciate anybodys opinion, but association doesnt equate to "knowledge". Ive arrested many a guy who could have beaten the **** out of me. Many people may take a poke at a Cop and try to get away, but have the brains enough to knock it off when they get caught. You are confusing ability with motivation here IMO. Just because Penn is a great fighter...so what, did you think he would break 3 cops arms, knockout 3 more and maybe kill 1 or 2 before he got "taken down"? Is that the type of guy Penn is? Maybe the story is Penn took a shot. Resisted a bit and finally got OC'd and arrested by 4-5 cops. In the end whats the difference?
In the end I would just say that it looks like Penn had a lapse of judgement and got in some trouble. I doubt he's going to see any time or "signifigant" punishment out of it. In my crystal judicial ball (depending on Penns history), I see a plea, maybe some probation(maybe), perhaps an adjournment in contemplation of dismissial, and counciling or reparations.