michaeledward
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2003
- Messages
- 6,063
- Reaction score
- 82
Food for thought: I agree that the 21 limit is silly, but it is the law. If you allow your kids to drink before they are legally able, what are you teaching them about obeying laws?
This is a realistic, and difficult challenge to address. In my home, it is not an issue, because we don't keep alcohol around the house much. I am a big fan of 'drawing inside the lines'. There is some legitimate merit that adults should not teach children to break the law.
While alcohol is a drug, it is also, and primarily a food. It should be treated as a food. Of course, we obese Americans have never demonstrated our ability to avoid gluttony very well. Just because the resturaunt sells a 28 ounce steak, it does not follow that we must order and eat a 28 ounce steak. Having a glass of wine with a meal does not mean tapping a keg at the meal.
I don't think that exposing youngsters to alcohol at an early age has much effect on whether or not they develop into alcoholics as much as the heritage of the young person dictates that. As we have discussed here before, cultures with longer exposure to alcohol (Italian, Greek, Jewish) have lower incidences of alcoholism than those cultures with shorter exposures to alcohol (Irish, Native American).