sgtmac_46
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 4,753
- Reaction score
- 189
In the case of raising children, a child should be treated based on his or her actions. There should be consequences for negative behavior and reward for positive behavior. The more severe the negative behavior, the more severe the consequences. However, those consequences have to be sure, they have to be immediate as possible, and they have to be severe enough to be seen as undesireable on the part of the child.Jonathan Randall said:That's true, and had the Columbine killers had any parental oversight, their actions to date before the massacre would have landed them in 24/7 surveillance and they would not have been allowed anywhere unescorted or allowed to possess so much as a rubber band gun.
However, going too far the other way likewise encourages rebellion. Both underdisciplining and overdisciplining are dangerous and cause a loss of respect for authority. Many (not speaking of you, or anyone else here) like to quote Biblical Scripture on parent's rights and yet ignore the Biblical commandment "Fathers provoketh not your child to wrath". Of course, this doesn't mean buy your kid an X-Box if he's acting like a little snot, but it does mean not throwing the book at him or her for every minor offense or overpunishing.
It is important to note that all but TWO of the students at Columbine were victims. Many demagogues have taken this to mean that all teens are potential killers just waiting for a chance to strike. Certainly, as an adult I would hate to be treated so just because a disgruntled adult employee went postal somewhere.
On edit: probably a little more than two as I believe that there were others who were either directly involved or had previous knowledge of what the two killers planned.