Ichimonji is from gyokko ryu. Seigan is from koto ryu.
I posted earlier but it seems to have been missed. There is Seigan no kamae from the unarmed portion of kukishin ryu.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ichimonji is from gyokko ryu. Seigan is from koto ryu.
I started this thread because perhaps Soke has been DIRECT about it since I last talked to Phil. If so... please say so.
Strawman. Who on earth said differently. Way to fight a battle with yourself.
At Mark Davis's dojo we were never taught the proper way to do gyokko ryu ichimonji, we were taught Hayes's way of doing it. If you did ichimonji correctly, they would tell you not to do it that way.So he never learned the Gyokko ryu version of doing Ichimonji no kamae while doing the kihon happo from that school. Devil Hanzo, please correct me if I am wrong.
Do we really have to make this into a bash the Bujinkan thread?
The question is about training with Mr Hayes. I really do not see how your post past your first paragraph helps with that discussion, if even that.
Devil Hanzo,
Do we really have to make this into a bash the Bujinkan thread?
The question is about training with Mr Hayes. I really do not see how your post past your first paragraph helps with that discussion, if even that.
My observation is that Mr Hatsumi has never made a direct public statement about people not training with the Gembukan or Jinenkan. Only about not training with 'former students.' It seems clear that Mr Hatsumi is not pleased at all with Mr Hayes and that he is now an ex-student of the Bujinkan.
Preferably, someone should be asking their friends like Phil in Japan about the matter rather than air things out on the internet. Barring that, my speculation seems as valid as anything else. Really, I am aware of Bujinkan people that cross- train with the Jinenkan and justify it because Mr Hatsumi did not specifically come and tell them to not do that. To me, it seems like they know that it is not what he wants and they are making excuses. I think that this may be a similar case.
In truth. I don't really care how other people stand in their kamae.
Okay, well I'll ask this of those like Syd who train in Japan.
Syd, how does your sensei stand in these kamae?
Honestly, IMO you are a matter of shame to the Bujinkan. I have a great respect for the Soke of the nine traditions of the Bujinkan. It is people like you that come straight out and say they don't care what is correct that makes it the laughingstock it is.
So you don't care what Masaaki Hatsumi of the Bujinkan says?
Do you have the Gyokko ryu DVD? You know, the one that was produced by the Soke of the Bujinkan himself? You will clearly see that he stands in an Ichimonji no kamae that is exactly as Devil Hanzo describes.
Again putting worsds in my mouth. Tisk tisk.Your teacher says different it seems. Well, I guess you are saying that he knows better than the soke of your art.
Or there is so much incorrect information running around that he does not know. And you are not willing to seek out deeper knowledge.
EXACTLY. See you say that to sound as an insult. But brother this is the perfect example why you just don't get it. Because while you spent last night talking about how foolish I am for not knowing the exact terminology for a posture I was doing randori with a 6 foot 4 130kg mountain of a man who picked me up as if I was a toddler and threw me to the ground with one arm. I then spent 45 minutes fighting him until with ure taijutsu, capturing space, balance and working on perfect timing I finally broke free of him and actually submitted him. I was left bruised and bleeding but I figured out some ways I can use my taijutsu to defeat people that I couldn't the day before. And repeated kata or the specific names of kamae and the history behind the ryu they come from where never going to do that.But of course, you are saying you don't care. What you have fits what you want to believe and has served you well until now.
But....there may be more to learn...greater depths to learn... more skill to be had if only you give up your ego and try to do things as closely as the soke of your style does.
Honestly, IMO you are a matter of shame to the Bujinkan. I have a great respect for the Soke of the nine traditions of the Bujinkan. It is people like you that come straight out and say they don't care what is correct that makes it the laughingstock it is.
Go ahead, flame away at me. I can take it. You don't care what the soke of your system says. You won't research, you won't go back to the source. You will only stay within the narrow limits of what you know. If you take offense in what I say, how about going beyond what your (I assume less than skilled) teacher says and ask the most knowledgeable person you can think of? Doc Jude just pointed out that you need to go to the source- are you saying you will stay only in the safe areas of what your teacher says?
I predict right here and now that you will respond in some way to me rather than seek out someone more knowledgable than your second- rate teacher.
At least he cares about making something useful out of his training, for what it's worth..
Sorry Nick, I am hesitant to put any descriptions of this sort of thing, as people tend to take things they read on the internet as fact. If I posted a mistake due to my inexperience or inability to properly express what I have been shown it would still make the rounds.
If I have time I could look at my notes and see what is written in the densho for the kamae, but most of my stuff is packed away as I am moving within a few weeks and I am also busy dealing with my 5 and a half week old daughter.
No not really. I prefer to actually train with real people and not watch videos about martial arts...is that what you mean by self defense in your primary style? You train from videos? Figures.
You see? That is the problem. You just wrote a huge attack on me for showing how wrong you were.
Masaaki Hatsumi of the Bujinkan produced a DVD on the Gyokko ryu. I would think that what he had shown in this video would be something you would want to look for when you want to see what Ichimonji from that school should look like. Instead, you refuse and attack me for even suggesting it.
Devil Hanzo said:...instead of a fudoken at the crook of the elbow.
Rubber Tanto said:... and one where it is down near the elbow of the other arm.
Again the insults against my teacher.There is a lot of wrong information out there. Some of seems to be spread by your teacher.
My sensei mentioned the same one Devil did. He just said its not the only one.
Hang on...in case I am misunderstanding you. Did you say the video was of Gyokku ryu only or on ALL of the 9 ryu?But it is the only one on the DVD by Mr Hatsumi.
Instead you ask me to come to your dojo and tell things to your face. Aren't we both a bit old for challenge matches and other testosterone- driven behavior?
All these personel attacks like trying to say I learn from videos, the call to meet you in person- these are not the sort of things I think your soke would approve of if he could read it.
And if you think that this reflects poorly on the Bujinkan, you can't blame me and you can't blame your soke. It was you who started in on the attacks.
Hang on...in case I am misunderstanding you. Did you say the video was of Gyokku ryu only or on ALL of the 9 ryu?
That is what Devil Hanzo said he was learning.
And can you point me to something produced by Mr Hatsumi that has something called ichimonji no kamae as a stance? Not ichi no kamae from the Togakure ryu or Seigan no kamae from either the Koto or the Kukishin ryu. I am talking about something produced and controlled by Mr Hatsumi that shows something called ichimonji no kamae as Devil Hanzo describes.
I do not want something done by any of his students on either a web site, video or personal comment. I want to check with the source. This may not sound like an important point, but just because you don't understand how it can be important does not mean that it is not.