My guess: the Yankees management knew exactly what they were doing when they picked the color/design combinations reported in the story, and calculated, down to the nickel, the likely profit they would net from the first shockwave of sales and the followup, minus the spin costs and possible lawsuit actions from advocacy groups like the people mentioned in the story, and came up in the black. Not very charitable; but my personal hunch is that the Yankees management, or any sports mega-franchise, would also sell cocaine to fifth graders if they could possibly figure out a way to do it legally, or even cost-effectively. After all, the sincere relentlessness with which MLB has pursued the anabolic drug angle amongst some of its top-performing stars tells you volumes about how disturbed those chaps really are when a whole generation of batters starts beating .300 a season... and laying down a genuinely astonishing number of home runs/multiple base hits per at-bats.
There's currently a class action suit we just heard about against a mortgage company that got hold of people's personal info from credit agencies illegally and used that information in their marketing plan. I'm sure this suit is going to expand to take in lots of such agencies, and again, I'm willing to bet anything that these outfits figured out exactly how much they would make vs. how much they'd lose in worst-case outcomes, found they'd still be in the black, and cheerfully went ahead. Don't look for ethical behavior from any of these folks, my friends....