I didn't say I couldn't take someone out, I said that a peer in my Judo class would have been taken down.
I use this term because it also transmits a feeling of someone who thinks they could fight would be stripped of that belief.
I apologize if martial arts are about fighting to me. Yes, they can be about simply subduing an opponent, perfectly to the point where they no longer pose a threat. However, I think it's my turn to point out that this is not realistic. It's not in human nature to be subdued and simply walk away. It's human nature to keep fighting someone who's beating you. And this means that most fights will end in someone being "taken down". In fact, this term is even more accurate because fights can often go to ground work rather quickly.
However, it seems that people have already formed conclusions about me based mostly on poor communication and misunderstandings. Because of this, I won't be likely to get help, because people will be too busy trying to correct things I personally don't see as a problem. So I suggest we let the thread simply die.
Acutally you have been given a great deal of help here and simply haven't see it because of your preconceived ideas not ours. Respected and experienced martial artists have answered your posts with understanding and very good advice. if you don't wish to take the advice that's up to you but please don't blame them for your apparent inability to understand what is said here.
My club is a 'fighting' club, most of us are either military,door staff, close protection officers or police officers. We also fight as a hobby, we do TMAs as well though. There is in the British forces at least, no emphasis at all on hitting people about the head, as you've been told the emphasis is on weapons, if you have to fight unarmed in a war zone you are in big, big trouble.