This is why I feel it is beneficial to train with schools that are part of a association. This way the ranking structure is pre-determined and belt colors CAN'T be added unless the organization leaders decide. ( Unlikely) I personally am wary of schools that operate outside organizations ( not saying all of them do) because this is where you find alot of the McDojo's . The ones that have 15 different belt colors, Black belt clubs, lots of 8 year old balck belts, and oh yeah, I forgot to mention , each colored belt level gets 3 stripes in between each belt level. IE orange 1 strip, Orange 2nd stripe, Orange 3 stripe then you test for next belt and start all over again for 3 more stripes.
Just my $0.02 . I don't see anything wrong with colored belt systems but overkill is too much and the mcdojo approach is wrong IMO.
Good point and sometimes very true. But, not always. On the flip side of that there are some organizations, federations, ect. that are very, prejudiced, holier than thou and political in nature which IMO is detremental to the students who see and hear such garbage spewed about other styles who are not affiliated with anything or are in another org./ fed. That's one of the reasons my teacher went on his own, started his own style and isolated himself from the BS that was happening at his time.
Thank goodness it has become not so prevelant as when I was coming up in rank. Today I see more and more open sharing and understanding of different diciplines and acceptance from and toward one another (such as this board as a matter of fact). It makes me very happy to see boards like this where open, honest and respectful discussion can be accomplished with minimum collateral damage.
Oh darn, kinda got off track this thread was about belt color right? sorry.
My opinion on how many belts or what color they are is up to each individual system as they see fit to guage rank according to their own tradition. Who cares if style A has 4,5 or 10 belts, who cares if style B has a blue, yellow or teal belt.
That's not what it's all about, never was and should never be.
The real questions that should be addressed is:
1. Are the Instructors competent and caring "teachers"?
2. Is this a style that works for me and my goals?
And the number one thing I ask myself everyday and my reason for teaching in the first place is:
Can this art I teach and how I teach it, help people to live better, more caring and understanding lives by showing them humility, patience, understanding and encouragement, while also exposing weaknesses and fraility or our own human nature.
If I can accomplish this I will be proud to have called myself a "teacher"
Michael