Steve
Mostly Harmless
The one major difference is that the things you're mentioning don't imply integrity, morality or a sense of trustworthiness. I don't have any problem with people selling an eclectic list of products. The point I'm making is that it's noteworthy when someone uses religion to add credibility to their business by tying themselves to a moral institution. The implicit statement is, "You can trust me, because I'm a christian." I am not saying that christians are untrustworthy, or that all christian businesses are scams. I am suggesting that the more blatant and pronounced this statement is made, the less likely it is to be true.Lots of seemingly unrelated things get combined in daily life and we never take notice. George Foreman and grills. Grocery stores and banks. Grocery stores and video rentals. Grocery stores and pharmacies.
McDonalds and healthy food. Oprah and weight loss. Those last two are two of the most popular things in the country. We all know that inspite of their claims, McDonalds is unhealthy and Oprah's been battling weight loss for decades. Yet, nearly all of us in the states still go to McDonalds and plenty of people pay attention to Oprah's diets, never mind the fact that she's consistently proven to lack competence in this area. Are we suspicious of McDonalds or Oprah? Not generally.I would say that this is a lapse of credibility. I can only say that I don't understand why someone would go to McD's for healthy food, but they're probably the same people who would trust "Steve the Christian Auto Mechanic (did I mention I would never overcharge you because I'm a Christian?)"
There is no difference. Again, I'm not saying all Christian martial arts schools are bad. I'm saying that it is likely used as a sales tool, and the more prominently the school features the religion, the more likely they are to be compensating or hiding a lack of substance in some other area. Whether that's quality, integrity or whatever.Being a school teacher provides a veneer of respectability. It just isn't religious. It puts the predator where their intended victims are and in a position where intended victims are more likely to listen and obey. There are Christian schools, which teach the same math, english, and US history that their secular counterparts do, with varying degrees of theology. How is that different than a martial arts school vs. a Christian martial arts school? Predators end up in both the Christian and the non-Christian, so having "Christian" on the label should neither raise nor lower one's suspicions in that area. That was the point I was making.Kind of. I'm saying what I said above. What I'm saying is that, if you go into a martial arts school and receive a sermon, you aren't receiving martial arts training. The sermon is a smoke screen for a LACK of actual training. The more the religion is emphasized, the more likely it is that this is intentionally obscuring the lack of training for some reason. Once again, this can be for a lot of reasons, but none of them are good, in my opinion and experience. I've seen things that range from gross incompetence to hiding past felony convictions for child molestation.So, in this instance, it isn't the idea that the uniforms have fish patches but that there's a degree of preaching going on. We have several auto repair places that advertise as being Christian run businesses, and to my knowledge, they don't offer a sermon while you wait, so I think that I see the distinction you're drawing.
I can almost guarantee you that, when religion is used prominently, it's a specific business related decision. Whether that's to hide a lack of competence, business acumen, integrity or whatever... it's used specifically to distract you as the customer from a lack of something else.I don't think that is used to mask incompetence most of the time. The issue that I run into is that the person is sometimes more qualified in their theology than they are in their craft. Like a youth minister who decides that karate is a good idea, so he starts teaching it. After all, he has a red belt from when he took classes at the 'Y'.
Come on, Daniel. Like that's a problem.Once again, I hope that I don't come accross as picking at you.
Daniel
Were someone to start a school where you learn about the Knights Templar, including martial and cultural lessons, I think that's great. Makes perfect sense. Not my cup of tea, but there you go.I think you'd be more likely to see an historical connection in sword schools, as historically, European knighthood and warrior culture was very much intertwined with the church of the day.
Daniel
I think it's about relevance. I said earlier that if I'm studying Shaolin Gung Fu, I would expect some monkeying about (hehe.) We mentioned a knights Templar. Sure, they may do some of that. Otherwise, I wouldn't and wouldn't expect to. Were I to go into my BJJ school and be expected to bow to a shrine, a cross, a bust of Helio's head, I'd wonder what the heck is going on. Once again, I wouldn't assume the worst, but I would definitely be suspicious.Here's a general question: how would people veiw a school where in place of a shinto shrine you had a Christian shrine that was bowed to? The classes had a period of meditation, then got into technique, closed with meditation, then bowing out, including bowing to the shrine. No sermons or prayer time except that which individuals may choose to do during meditation.
How would that be perceived?
Daniel