Archangel M
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 4,555
- Reaction score
- 154
[yt]E9w9AfptGGQ[/yt]
Let's see what you all think?
Let's see what you all think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really!!!! Were we looking at the same video?He needed back-up.
If he couldn't physically control the suspect he should have used some sort of less lethal like OC IMO. As far as "taking control of the situation" thats easier said than done for those who haven't tried it. I did notice the officers lack of strong verbal commands though. I'm thinking he was fairly new and way in over his head.
At the time when he punched the woman in pink, OC wasn't a really available option. His hands were tied up, and you have to have at least one hand free enough to deploy the OC (or anything else). The strike was absolutely justifiable -- and he stopped when she backed out of the fight. The strike drove her back, and got her off of him. However, as I said, he didn't escalate in dealing with the original offender.First and foremost, as soon as people started resisting, he should've called for backup, new or seasoned officer. IMO, its better to air in the side of caution, rather than trying to deal with something like this, especially with a large group forming.
As Arch said, he was using alot of verbal commands, which, had he not hit her, would probably have been his saving grace.
As for the hit....IMO, in a situation like that, I do not feel that the hit was proper. Now, if 5 other people suddenly joined in and started beating him, then yeah, he's outnumbered, and in that case, if he started swinging back, then I see no issues with that. That actually happened to one of our plain clothes narc. dets. one day. Started chasing the guy, the guy stopped and started throwing punches.
As far as this goes though, I think the OC would've been the better choice. Blast them both with a shot of it, and I'm sure their 'fire' would've been put out.
As always, this video was only started when the officer was attempting to detain/arrest the first girl. I would have loved to have physically seen what happened earlier. I'm sure, had we seen that, we'd have seen this girl acting just as much of an *** as she was when being arrested.
And as punisher said, why keep playing around with her standing? Take her down. The downside, as said, is he's more vulnerable. Then again, by the looks of the growing crowd, he was rapidly getting placed in a bad position. Call for backup. I"m assuming he called out his location to dispatch, so even if he wasn't able to use his radio, hit the panic button. Again, assuming the radio has one, which I believe they all do. At least help would've been on the way.
He'd face the same suit over the Taser or pepper spray. He needed to deal with her RIGHT then; his hands were his most available and direct option. I can really make a case from the video that he could have felt she was going for his gun...I'd have maced her or used the taser. The punch was justified, but I guarantee he'll be sued over it and get 12 jerks on the jury who will totally overlook the circumstances and hang him out to dry.
[yt]E9w9AfptGGQ[/yt]
Let's see what you all think?
Seattle Urban League CEO James Kelly says the punch was an overreaction that brought to mind a video taken April 17 of two Seattle officers kicking a Hispanic suspect.
At the time when he punched the woman in pink, OC wasn't a really available option. His hands were tied up, and you have to have at least one hand free enough to deploy the OC (or anything else). The strike was absolutely justifiable -- and he stopped when she backed out of the fight. The strike drove her back, and got her off of him. However, as I said, he didn't escalate in dealing with the original offender.
It's actually kind of simple. An officer is empowered to use sufficient force to obtain his lawful goal; the girl in question refused verbal commands, and began to pull away and try to escape his control. He did have grounds to involuntarily detain her to investigate the traffic infraction, so he had grounds to use the force necessary to do so. He begins to escalate to stronger holds, and got locked in a game of tug o' war over her wrists. I can think of a lot of reasons why he might not have escalated, ranging from just didn't think of it through "she's a girl" or questioned his own authority to use more force and was afraid of liability. Especially when the second woman joined in -- he could have backed off, and presented a higher level of force, and called for back up.
He probably should have at least been going for OC or a baton