the reader's main complaint was she could not finish reading it because it was "too historic".
My guess is her take on Math would be "too many numbers".
May she teach her children well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the reader's main complaint was she could not finish reading it because it was "too historic".
That's the tough part about good historic movies and books - figuring out what to keep in and what to leave out, because EVERYTHING is important.
I received a bad review on a translation I published once - the reader's main complaint was she could not finish reading it because it was "too historic". The book was published in the "historic fiction" section of Amazon and the description stated very clearly it was based on the life of Alexander the Great - from his rise to power to his death. Also, the page size and number of pages were clearly indicated - as is the case with all the stuff published on Amazon. <sigh> You just can't please everyone.
yeah, but I work in the hospital,
'Oh, how long does a flu test take?'
"not very long, why?"
'Not much, just because I've been in and out of those rooms yesterday all day, and today they under isolation?'
Not one, but two....just yesterday....
Threatened already, if I get it, I'll be out at least a week.
I love my nurses, but they are not very precise with isolation protocol...
Quite possibly. Sadly, she is not alone. I routinely publish science fiction - both my own and translated. And there are always some who complain... wait for it... wait for it... that it's "too scientific".My guess is her take on Math would be "too many numbers".
May she teach her children well.
fantasy would be their genre thenQuite possibly. Sadly, she is not alone. I routinely publish science fiction - both my own and translated. And there are always some who complain... wait for it... wait for it... that it's "too scientific".
Last year I translated and published a biography of Chopin - he died young too, but it was a BIG thick book. I suppose people will complain about it as well.And the man only lived to be in his 30s.
Could you imagine her disgust over a Queen Victoria or George Washington Story?!
Amazon is my primary channel. I used to also publish for Nook, but Barnes and Noble gives indie authors zero support and offer no viable strategies. So, I stopped. I focus on Amazon now and publish both in eBook format and in paperback. I also have a small collection on Lulu - for the books I want to offer in hardcover.fantasy would be their genre then
Where do you publish though?
Yeah, that complaint is like the people who come to a public seminar titled "MS Excel: The Basics", then later complain, "It was too basic." :SIGH:That's the tough part about good historic movies and books - figuring out what to keep in and what to leave out, because EVERYTHING is important.
I received a bad review on a translation I published once - the reader's main complaint was she could not finish reading it because it was "too historic". The book was published in the "historic fiction" section of Amazon and the description stated very clearly it was based on the life of Alexander the Great - from his rise to power to his death. Also, the page size and number of pages were clearly indicated - as is the case with all the stuff published on Amazon. <sigh> You just can't please everyone.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...r/news-story/049e97e47f54de889d0d3e76be27524aYeah, that complaint is like the people who come to a public seminar titled "MS Excel: The Basics", then later complain, "It was too basic." :SIGH:
At least some of those folks are complaining about things they weren't (and shouldn't have had to be) told.
Ah, yes! Oldies but goodies!
I was surprised the people who complained about the color of the sand didn't add, "And WHY didn't anyone tell us the damn sand gets EVERYWHERE?!"At least some of those folks are complaining about things they weren't (and shouldn't have had to be) told.
Already did. I got this one from fighting a chainsaw wielding crocodile.And make up cool stories to tell your co-workers.
Already did. I got this one from fighting a chainsaw wielding crocodile.
Just to be clear, I'm a huge fan of the Star Wars universe, but I'm a bigger fan of good movies that have solid writing and production. I can forgive a lot, though, if it makes sense. The biggest problems with Episode 1 were the rampant racist stereotypes and over-reliance on special effects to the detriment of the film. Oh, and while the first trilogy was grounded in the hero's journey, the prequel trilogy seemed to be grounded in a weird mishmash of C-Span and Fox Business. But that's water under the bridge.There are legitimate criticisms people have towards the film, myself included. The SW fan base in general is hard to please and like to complain. They complained about the prequels because they were too different from the originals, yet they also complained the the Force Awakens was too similar to A New Hope. I was more so referring to the fans calling it "trash" or "the worst Star wars movie".
I don't know if that's canon or not. But it's just not the way space works. While I get that Star Wars physics is more like WWII dogfighting than what real space would look like, this just defies everything we know about how things in space react to simple things like inertia. Gun guys often complain about how "That isn't how that works. No one would do that." Blah, blah. I get it. It's a movie. But this is like having a gun fight scene in a western where the main character is literally holding the gun backwards and upside down.Spoilers below
Addressing you criticisms
1. In the Expanded Universe different ships have different sources of energy. Star Destroyers have multiple reactors, but Ghost from Rebels uses fuel. Other Star Wars novels and video games already introduced the concept of starship fuel years ago. Though them slowly out running the First Order seemed silly.
Sure. I get it. But Poe isn't the one in authority. Benedict Arnold was acting as his conscious dictated. And is anyone surprised that when he was found out, he was hung? People don't mutiny or commit treason because they think they have a choice. And, really, no, he didn't have any right to question her. In a military organization, she owed him no explanation. Blame the writers. They wrote him into a situation where there is no reasonable alternative to getting rid of him. In any society I know of, that would have been grounds for execution, but I can see maybe exiling him.2. I see it from Poe's point of view. Vice Admiral Holdo wasn't informing her officers of the plan to escape the First Order. She was dismissive and condescending to Poe for no apparent reason. Poe had every right to question her and he was well within reason to stage a mutiny thinking she was leading them into to death.
Yeah, but I don't think Kylo is going to remain a villain. He will redeem himself, and then we just get an unsatisfying end. I'm not trying to be a doom and gloom guy. I want these to be good. But they have to get some better writers involved.3. I couldn't agree more about General Hux, he came off as imposing, intelligent and ruthless in the Force Awakens. Unfortunately, they changed the overall dynamics of his character just to be force slapped around in The Last Jedi. I liked the direction they took Kylo's character in. Conflicted villains can be interesting, understanding their motivation is a great way to get the audience to empathize with them.