Why would it do that? You assume, firstly, that there is a deficiency in the quality of these tests now. An assumption that has yet to be proven.
And you ignore, secondly, the evidence that "big multi-school tests", such as are given NOW, at the KKW itself, have lower standards than most of us apply.
I think you've totally misunderstood what I was trying to say. I changed topics a bit and I think maybe I was unclear about that, so let me try again.
You've said is that the quality of big national/regional tests like they do at KKW is often not very good, because a lot of examiners on the panels don't care and just rush people through rather than grading them properly.
So my thought is this. This move by Kukkiwon - to require examiners to take a class before they can be a judge at an event like that - may be an attempt to correct
that problem. If the examiners at KKW etc are better qualified after taking this course (and the apathetic/lazy ones don't bother with it and quit being judges), it may raise the overall standards of those big national/regional tests. The ones that currently have a low standard.
I think, as Americans (those of us that are Americans), we've been thinking about how this impacts the US, and whether this is a result of something done by masters in the US. I know I was. But it might have nothing at all to do with that.
Now, that still doesn't address the problem of how this will (or even
could, if they're trying to start this next year!) be implemented in places like the US where testing is not currently done that way, and where that kind of testing may or may not even be feasible.