OP
Greg
Guest
- Thread Starter
- #81
Bruce:
I've spoken with Master Whalen about the incident that occurred on May 2nd and I think that the comments you've made with regard to instructor-student relationships don't really apply here. I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, because I agree with a great deal of what you have to say with regard to a student's expectations from his/her instructor. I also think that instructor-student relationships can be abused and this issue is hardly ever discussed. However, I don't think this is the issue here. Master Whalen doesn't mind dissenting opinions in the least and he doesn't expect everyone to always support his take on things. In fact, anyone who knows him well will tell you that he doesn't have much of an ego at all.
What I see is that he was offended by the fact that you didn't show any appreciation for the generosity he extended to you throughout the weekend. And had you told him during the training session that you felt your needs were not being met, he would have done everything he could to meet them. But...you never let him know. And if you know Hal you would understand that his intentions were to sincerely help you. You could have let him know what you felt you needed and this would have taken care of everything. I mean, what about the water principle? What about being fluid and flexible to the situation?
Forget the instructor-student relationship for a minute and simply look at it from the vantage point of common courtesy.
If I opened my home to a friend and did everything I could to be a good host, but then something later in the visit didn't go the way either of us expected (say the pipes burst and flooded his bedroom), I would still expect my friend to be thankful for hospitality I had extended. It's also like being invited to someone's home for a 7 course meal and then getting upset when the dessert didn't quite meet your expectations. Instead of having the thought, "Dammit that dessert didn't satisfy me," why not take the attitude of, "Well that was nice that a friend invited me over for dinner and while it could have been better I'll thank him for his generosity and for the dinner as a whole."
This is why Master Whalen became upset. It has nothing to do with the fact that he is a 7th Dan and you're a 4th Dan. It has nothing to do with you having different opinions regarding this-or-that. It has nothing to do with the KHF or his position within the KHF.
One thing that struck me about Master Whalen from the beginning was how he was not "caught up" in all the mannerisms that you so often see in some masters and instructors. Some will be so artificially formal it's instead of just being genuinely kind and respectful. And along with this, many use their rank as way to justify speaking or acting towards others in a somewhat condescending manner. This is definitely NOT Hal Whalen.
Again, I know you might respond by saying that you're needs were not met. But again, this is someone that you met for the first time, someone that you were attempting to forge a friendship and someone that over the long haul had a great deal that he could offer to you. For that reason, good communication would have gone a long way. And instead of looking at it from the side that you didn't get your needs met - why not take a step back and simply look at the overall interaction as a whole. Were your actions that day a little over-the-top? If they were because you injured your leg and that ruined the possibility of testing for 4th Dan in June, I'm sure he would have understood. I certainly would. But again...you never told him.
Perhaps a little more flexibility with others might better serve you needs in the long run.
Sincerely,
Greg Polites
I've spoken with Master Whalen about the incident that occurred on May 2nd and I think that the comments you've made with regard to instructor-student relationships don't really apply here. I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, because I agree with a great deal of what you have to say with regard to a student's expectations from his/her instructor. I also think that instructor-student relationships can be abused and this issue is hardly ever discussed. However, I don't think this is the issue here. Master Whalen doesn't mind dissenting opinions in the least and he doesn't expect everyone to always support his take on things. In fact, anyone who knows him well will tell you that he doesn't have much of an ego at all.
What I see is that he was offended by the fact that you didn't show any appreciation for the generosity he extended to you throughout the weekend. And had you told him during the training session that you felt your needs were not being met, he would have done everything he could to meet them. But...you never let him know. And if you know Hal you would understand that his intentions were to sincerely help you. You could have let him know what you felt you needed and this would have taken care of everything. I mean, what about the water principle? What about being fluid and flexible to the situation?
Forget the instructor-student relationship for a minute and simply look at it from the vantage point of common courtesy.
If I opened my home to a friend and did everything I could to be a good host, but then something later in the visit didn't go the way either of us expected (say the pipes burst and flooded his bedroom), I would still expect my friend to be thankful for hospitality I had extended. It's also like being invited to someone's home for a 7 course meal and then getting upset when the dessert didn't quite meet your expectations. Instead of having the thought, "Dammit that dessert didn't satisfy me," why not take the attitude of, "Well that was nice that a friend invited me over for dinner and while it could have been better I'll thank him for his generosity and for the dinner as a whole."
This is why Master Whalen became upset. It has nothing to do with the fact that he is a 7th Dan and you're a 4th Dan. It has nothing to do with you having different opinions regarding this-or-that. It has nothing to do with the KHF or his position within the KHF.
One thing that struck me about Master Whalen from the beginning was how he was not "caught up" in all the mannerisms that you so often see in some masters and instructors. Some will be so artificially formal it's instead of just being genuinely kind and respectful. And along with this, many use their rank as way to justify speaking or acting towards others in a somewhat condescending manner. This is definitely NOT Hal Whalen.
Again, I know you might respond by saying that you're needs were not met. But again, this is someone that you met for the first time, someone that you were attempting to forge a friendship and someone that over the long haul had a great deal that he could offer to you. For that reason, good communication would have gone a long way. And instead of looking at it from the side that you didn't get your needs met - why not take a step back and simply look at the overall interaction as a whole. Were your actions that day a little over-the-top? If they were because you injured your leg and that ruined the possibility of testing for 4th Dan in June, I'm sure he would have understood. I certainly would. But again...you never told him.
Perhaps a little more flexibility with others might better serve you needs in the long run.
Sincerely,
Greg Polites