I don't, of course. But you didn't offer any cogent facts or citations from history. You dismissed the work cited by mauna because the authors were Poles. You offered no reason to do so other than the fact that they were Poles, such as offering other works, citations or academics which would support your point. When I challenged you on it, you responded with a remark about close minded goy.
What else am I supposed to think?
History is not argued by dismissing the historian for no good reason.
And he's been asked for titles and authors.
We can't directly cite other sources because it never happened. History books are usualy light on mentioning things that don't happen.