I think In the beginning this is very true but as the church and state became intertwined it was they,the church and state who shaped society. More so the Church as that was whom had intimate and immediate contact with the people. And then " who will rid me of this meddlesome priest" heads rolled, Abbeys burned and the king once again had control. This was the Nobility's contribution to the Reformation.
This translates nicely into the people having control in a democracy. GW babbling on about God and aligning church and state is going backwards.
This is way way off topic Jarrod.
lori
oh i don't know that it's that off topic; it helps us to understand exactly what we mean by "christian nation". debating roman state vs church is sort of a chicken or the egg debate. but i think it's worth noting that prior to the romanization of christianity, the church & state didn't resemble each other very closely at all. but constantine was sort of the original GW, he did an excellent job of manipulating religious sentiment to fit political ends. which of course is dangerous on both ends...the religious institution finds itself comprimising in order to win state acceptence, & civic life finds itself unable to function without at least some religious sanction. any concept of a christian nation originates in rome.
jf