Johnathan Napalm
Black Belt
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2003
- Messages
- 617
- Reaction score
- 0
DAC, it is kind of expected for you to make the posts above. I kind of feel sorry for you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Johnathan Napalm
DAC, it is kind of expected for you to make the posts above. I kind of feel sorry for you.
Originally posted by Johnathan Napalm
Now I truly feel sorry for you! LMAO!! A Very sad case indeed....
Didn't you mention that you have had 50 martial instructors?
Jonathon Napalm
Your lies:
1. You lied about the 9mm being more lethal than the 45.
Fact: Every one knows that the 45 is proven in battles for over 90 years. 1 shot 1 kill. This is even before the hollowpoint was invented.
Originally posted by DAC..florida
Negative you must have me confused with someone else!!
Why wont you answer the questions I have asked?
:goop:
Originally posted by Kenpo Yahoo
.....This is not a correct statement. I work at a local hospital and we see quite a few GS victims. One patient had a GS wound (.45 caliber at less than 15 feet, shot by his wife) and he lived.\
It is nearly impossible to characterize the destructiveness of something without getting incredibly specific. If you were to say that a .45 caliber slug ripping through someones liver or heart would prove fatal, then quite possibly this could be true. However, to make such all encompassing blanket statements, as the ones that you have made, is both an asinine and remiss characterization of the martial arts.....
Originally posted by Kenpo Yahoo
.....Things function on a probability scale. By learning the martial arts from a qualified and talented instructor you slightly increase your odds of surviving an encounter. This goes for women, men, and children. Does this mean that you can take out anyone at anytime? NO! It simply means that you have a better chance today than you did yesterday. It means that you develop a sense of self worth that will make you fight harder today, than you would have yesterday. It's about developing an appreciation for life that makes you want to live more today than you did yesterday. See a pattern yet.
Being bigger, stronger, or faster, are all qualities that increase your odds of surviving an altercation but they are by no means a guarantee of anything. Anyone can be caught off guard, especially if they are an attacker expecting compliance. ...
Originally posted by Johnathan Napalm
Much to my dissappointmet (not really actually), all of you who claimed to work in Law enforcement, security, bouncing, yada yada yada, for how long and how long and so forth and so forth, NOT one of you have even mentioned the first principle of security! Shame on all of you. Some of you ought to be fired from your positions if you were actually IN those positions at all.
The most successful bouncers DO NOT get into fights! Sheeze! Any one who has been in the bouncing business successfully, would tell you that the NUMBER 1 rule is De-escalating the situation! Your job is to stop the confrontation from happening. No business owner would give a hoot about your ability to pound the trouble makers into a bloody pulp. No, dumb ***! You are not hired to create lawsuits for the owner. You are hired to PREVENT problems from happening in the first place!.
As for LEO. LMAO at those who claim to be LEO here. You ought to be fired for incompetency. Only the dumbest of the rookies would charge right into a situation without sufficient backup. You have been watching too much Hollywood BS. Every experienced COP will tell you his first and foremost concern is to go home alive at the end of his shift. It is always the phony BS instructors who would be talking about how to clear a house room by room ALONE! LMAO. Every experienced cop will tell you DON'T DO THAT you DUMB ***! Get a team of back up! As for Cops fighting criminals in hand to hand combat using MA.... LMAO Riiiightttttttt Watching too much TV again, huh? Just how did you graduate from the academy?
Even the best of the best, who work security detail for States VIPs, would take RISK AVOIDANCE as the cardinal principle of operation. The FIRST RULE is DON"T TAKE the Unnecessary RISK!
Only 2 types who advocate the stupidity of resorting to force against a psychopatic sociopath 2X his/her size. The first type is the inexperienced newbies who do NOT know anything about the concept of RISK. They are what you called "all brawl and no brain". They will learn, if they live long enough. The second type is the phony half baked promoters who are pathetically patronizing the women and children by selling them a false sense of security, ie selling what Jill put as "horse manure" and what RSK called " a lie" .
Life is precious. There are OTHER options besides resorting to using force against a 250 lb psycho, putting your life and health at risk consequently!! It is called RISK AVOIDANCE!!!
Personal security is about SITUATION AWARENESS! THe first rule of preventing rape is TO AVOID Getting into HIGH RISK SITUATIONS !! Not the horse manure about how to defeat a 250lb psycho! Sheeze! Using force is the last of the last resort! Every genuine professional would tell you that! Always be aware of your situation. Take all necessary precaution and preemption. Do not assume unnecessary risk. ONLY when all other options are lost then you have no choice but to use force, taking a great risk to your health and life.
Moreover, EVERY genuine professional would teach you to use all sort of weapons (household goods or security devices such as OC spray etc), to put the odds in your favour. NOT one responsible professional instructor would advocate the horse manure been peddled here about using bare hand MA to taggle a 250 psycho!
To go straight to counting on resorting to using force, is plain stupid! You are betting the health and life of the women on an uncertain outcome! You are giving her a false sense of security. That is immoral and criminal! Not to mention incompetence!
Sheeze ! The degree of ignorance of these self appointed ''masters", founders (or flounders are probably more accurate) is mind boggling!
Originally posted by chufeng
The standard issue pistol in the Army, at one time was the .38 caliber...unfortunately, to the dismay of many a soldier, the Army found out that an entire magazine could be unloaded into a rushing opponent, and he would keep coming (even with a fatal wound)...
So, the Army switched to the .45 caliber pistol...one shot, if it encountered the intended target, would STOP the assailant...not necessarily kill him...but stopping power was what the Army wanted...
More recently, the Army has adopted the 9mm pistol...largely because it is a bit more accurate (people are less intimidated by its kick) in MOST soldiers' hands...
The .45 is still the weapon of choice for many in the armed services...it would be my choice...but hitting the target is probably more important than launching "potentially" dangerous rounds randomly down-range...so both weapons are effective DEPENDING on the shooters capabilities.
:asian:
chufeng
Why wont you answer the questions I have asked?
Your question is irrelevant to the issue.
The standard issue pistol in the Army, at one time was the .38 caliber...unfortunately, to the dismay of many a soldier, the Army found out that an entire magazine could be unloaded into a rushing opponent, and he would keep coming (even with a fatal wound)...
both weapons are effective DEPENDING on the shooters capabilities.
Originally posted by Johnathan Napalm
Try reading this:
Originally posted by Johnathan Napalm
That must be someone else then.
Your question is irrelevant to the issue.
Originally posted by SteelShadow
I was just wandering what it takes to cross the line
one of the main resons I come here is because it is friendly.