And here is an old chronicle of liberal/lefty love speech:
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/1...mate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/1...mate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/
hmmm...the african american community notices the abortion issue
- Thread starter billc
- Start date
Big Don
Sr. Grandmaster
The United States Supreme Court would disagree.
Cool down, brah
Ramirez
Black Belt
I don't give a rat's ***! Innocent children were killed because of this left/right extremism that you love to propagate! This isn't amusing anymore! I don't care if I get banned, this ins'nt some harmless debate!
There are idiots out there taking this debate as justification TO KILL CHILDREN!
Ramirez
Black Belt
I don't give a flying **** at a galloping horse at the united states supreme court when it comes to the lives of my children!
Folks, relax eh?
Thanks.
Thanks.
On the Oslo murderer:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/oslo-killer-plagiarized-unabombers-manifesto/
from the article:
Oslo killer Anders Behring Breivik plagiarized his manifesto from the manifesto written by Theodore John “Ted” Kaczynski the Unabomber. Kaczynski wrote his 50-plus page, 35,000-word essay Industrial Society and Its Future, abbreviated to “Unabomber Manifesto” by the FBI, back in 1995.
----------------------
This nut job murderer quoted everyone.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/oslo-killer-plagiarized-unabombers-manifesto/
from the article:
Oslo killer Anders Behring Breivik plagiarized his manifesto from the manifesto written by Theodore John “Ted” Kaczynski the Unabomber. Kaczynski wrote his 50-plus page, 35,000-word essay Industrial Society and Its Future, abbreviated to “Unabomber Manifesto” by the FBI, back in 1995.
----------------------
This nut job murderer quoted everyone.
Twin Fist
Grandmaster
yes it is.
You are either for the 1st amendment or you are not, and you are clearly NOT, like most leftist, you want to censor speech you dont agree with.
color me not shocked you want to censor people
Ramirez
Black Belt
Go to hell TF! I am supposed to be on your ignore list. DO IT!
On the Oslo killers leftism:
http://bigjournalism.com/edulis/201...letely-destroys-christian-conservative-label/
from the article:
Below, you can see how, to save the environment, he wants the world to rid itself of oil consumption. You can see how he wants a one-child policy, government control of private industries, the breakup of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, the military support of Russia to prevent a possible U.S. invasion of Europe, and the removal of all U.S. military bases from European soil. Yes, the tea party platform through and through, folks!First of all, many thanks to the anonymous blogger Sooper Mexican, who has unearthed this information from the giant screed and organized it in an easily understandable, concise manner. For those who would quibble that this is an untrustworthy source, his post consists of direct quotes from the manifesto with commentary– I repeat, direct quotes. I repeat them here with the blogger’s emphases.
-------------------------
HMMM...WANTS THE GOVERNMENT TO CONTROL PRIVATE BUSINESSES, WANTS TO GET RID OF OIL, DOESN'T LIKE RUPERT MURDOCH, DOESN'T LIKE THE U.S., LIKES THE RUSSIANS AND PLAGARIZED THE UNABOMBER. THAT DOESN'T EXACTLY SCREAM RIGHT WING TO ME. HOW ABOUT YOU?
http://bigjournalism.com/edulis/201...letely-destroys-christian-conservative-label/
from the article:
Below, you can see how, to save the environment, he wants the world to rid itself of oil consumption. You can see how he wants a one-child policy, government control of private industries, the breakup of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, the military support of Russia to prevent a possible U.S. invasion of Europe, and the removal of all U.S. military bases from European soil. Yes, the tea party platform through and through, folks!First of all, many thanks to the anonymous blogger Sooper Mexican, who has unearthed this information from the giant screed and organized it in an easily understandable, concise manner. For those who would quibble that this is an untrustworthy source, his post consists of direct quotes from the manifesto with commentary– I repeat, direct quotes. I repeat them here with the blogger’s emphases.
-------------------------
HMMM...WANTS THE GOVERNMENT TO CONTROL PRIVATE BUSINESSES, WANTS TO GET RID OF OIL, DOESN'T LIKE RUPERT MURDOCH, DOESN'T LIKE THE U.S., LIKES THE RUSSIANS AND PLAGARIZED THE UNABOMBER. THAT DOESN'T EXACTLY SCREAM RIGHT WING TO ME. HOW ABOUT YOU?
From the nut job killers writings: ( I didn't want to post this guys stuff, but some believe this nut job murderer was a right wing christian, here are some of his views)
Getting around is necessary, oil is not. Considerable efforts should be made to further develop high-power Lithium-Ion batteries. The goal should be to aim foroil independence. This will not only save the environment; it will completely devastate many Muslim countries economically which will weaken the ongoing Islamic imperialism. (p. 1199)All 2nd and 3rd world countries (where the average birth rate is above 2,1 [sic]) are to implement 1 child policies until their country is stabilised in regards to financial outlooks and overconsumption, saving their forests etc. This will both solve their poverty problem and result in drastic cuts in global pollutiondue to the fact that the population (consumer) explosion will be reversed. You cannot have any hope of reducing global pollution unless you focus on reducing the current population explosion in 2nd and 3rd world countries. Any country that does not comply will not receive any incentives (aid, development funding/loans, and trade import/export concessions). This approach can also be used for giving these countries incentives to stop them from cutting down their forests. (p. 1200)
On Corporations/ The Rich
Getting around is necessary, oil is not. Considerable efforts should be made to further develop high-power Lithium-Ion batteries. The goal should be to aim foroil independence. This will not only save the environment; it will completely devastate many Muslim countries economically which will weaken the ongoing Islamic imperialism. (p. 1199)All 2nd and 3rd world countries (where the average birth rate is above 2,1 [sic]) are to implement 1 child policies until their country is stabilised in regards to financial outlooks and overconsumption, saving their forests etc. This will both solve their poverty problem and result in drastic cuts in global pollutiondue to the fact that the population (consumer) explosion will be reversed. You cannot have any hope of reducing global pollution unless you focus on reducing the current population explosion in 2nd and 3rd world countries. Any country that does not comply will not receive any incentives (aid, development funding/loans, and trade import/export concessions). This approach can also be used for giving these countries incentives to stop them from cutting down their forests. (p. 1200)
On Corporations/ The Rich
All globalist companies will be nationalised (a minimum of 50,1% ownership must be redistributed to EF governments hands (combined) at any given time, for their respective countries). Investors with majority control who refuse this re-nationalisation process will have their respective corporation expelled from the European Federation monetary zone (losing trading concessions). Ensuring state control is the only way to avoid that globalist capitalist political lobby groups continue to negatively influence European policies relation to immigration and multiculturalism. (p. 1200)
I never thought I would actually argue against capitalism but the US model is an extreme variant, almost resembling a pure laissez faire model. 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are now in the hands of 1 percent of the people. 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans. (p. 1223)
Is capitalism always a force for freedom? It is easy for “conservatives” to think so, but is it always true? (p. 403) [he then goes on to argue it isn't]
On American Foreign Policy
I never thought I would actually argue against capitalism but the US model is an extreme variant, almost resembling a pure laissez faire model. 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are now in the hands of 1 percent of the people. 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans. (p. 1223)
Is capitalism always a force for freedom? It is easy for “conservatives” to think so, but is it always true? (p. 403) [he then goes on to argue it isn't]
On American Foreign Policy
On page 1235, the manifesto lists their school of thought as being “Against excessive US cultural influence” and “Against US military bases/US military personnel on European soil.” … In this same section, the Manifesto supports Russian nationalism, as well as Chinese nationalism.
Reason 1: The reason [underlying America's foreign policy] given by the USA, its media and its friends around the world. Reasons like Communism, Terrorism, Fascism, Human Rights, Freedom, Liberation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, etc.
Reason 2: The actual reason. This is usually hidden from the general public and has to be looked for in quotes by under-reported officials or subsequent events on the ground. Often, the victims of the intervention/change of government know the real reasons better than the populations of the Western countries. Real reasons are many but usually include Business Interests,Access to Resources, Markets, Military Bases, Strategic Value, orPolitical Support. (p. 1297)
---------------------
DOES THIS SEEM LIKE SOMEONE WHO IS A RIGHT WINGER.
Reason 1: The reason [underlying America's foreign policy] given by the USA, its media and its friends around the world. Reasons like Communism, Terrorism, Fascism, Human Rights, Freedom, Liberation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, etc.
Reason 2: The actual reason. This is usually hidden from the general public and has to be looked for in quotes by under-reported officials or subsequent events on the ground. Often, the victims of the intervention/change of government know the real reasons better than the populations of the Western countries. Real reasons are many but usually include Business Interests,Access to Resources, Markets, Military Bases, Strategic Value, orPolitical Support. (p. 1297)
---------------------
DOES THIS SEEM LIKE SOMEONE WHO IS A RIGHT WINGER.
Ann Coulter on political incivility:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/07/l...mas-ann-coulter-on-liberals-missing-civility/
http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/07/l...mas-ann-coulter-on-liberals-missing-civility/
