Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you, Sir. While I studied SKK at one time, wasn't taught any real background knowledge. so am trying to go back and fill that in since I still practice much of what I learned. Your posts go a long way in aiding my quest. :asian:
Master Shuras,
Thanks for the clarification. I had heard that Mr. Cerio got the pinians, except for #2, from an Oyama book. I assumed it was Kyokushinkai. Then I saw a link in another thread that went to youtube, where it was listed as kyokushinkai forms. That's why I went with that in my post. Sorry to all, my Bad!So, they are really Shotokan forms? The book Mr. Cerio got it from was Mr. Oyama doing Shotokan?
I totally agree with Professor Shuras post # 27. Most of the older SKK guard are on the same page.
:ultracool
Hi Hand Sword. I'd love to see some of Oyama's forms for comparison. Can you recommend a DVD of Oyama's forms, or maybe even youtube links? Thanks.
:lol:We are the fossill fuel of the future.
iratesku
hello, awesome forum!! awesome topic!! i was wondering if anyone felt as though our kenpo/kempo forms lacked congruency.[ i train under professor tom sotis who is now mostly known as a knife-fighting instructor but has spent a great deal of his life training in kenpo]. professor sotis presented me with many questions regarding our forms and it always came back to congruency. his point being-- the forms for any given level are suppose to have self -defense applications known as bunkai, but those applications from the kata are not the required self-defense criteria. it is a direct contradiction to teach that kata hold the techniques/secrets of the art and then resort to other techniques when it comes time to apply them. that being said it really got me thinking as to why the original 26 combinations aren't in our forms ??or maybe why our forms don't better match the way we fight?? we really don't fight the way we practice our kata. i understand and enjoy the benefits of practicing our kata however i do feel as though this is 1 area that the forms come up a little short. i have been viewing this forum for months you guys do an awesome job !! i am very impressed with the feedback on all the topics and enjoy it very much. jason scaduto
for the record i teach and practice the pinans the way i learned them from masters self defense centers, not the way Shiahn Ingargiola does. i like them this way and i use the guard with the katas
marlon
RevIV,
What are the major differences between these different versions?
Masters Self-Defense Centers took the Villari Pinans and then did kindof a mix and match. The two top people at Masters both know the Shotokan versions and had the higher black belts learn them as well. There were some moves than taken out of the SKK pinans and the older more traditional moves put back in. So in the Masters Self-Defense Versions you had a little SKK and a little traditional put together. As stated before, i do like these forms but like others have said they do not mix with what we teach so i have taken them out of my schools curriculum.. If i were to ever teach them again i would do the straight shotokan versions so as not to mix principal based forms with technique based.
Jesse
Jesse, do you see techniques as defense based or priniciple based or both?
respectfully,
marlon
RevIV,
Just between the FVSSD and the MSDC. I know the Shotokan version. Thanks,