History of how Bruce came up with JKD as way of no way...followed J.Krisnamurti.
Having NO form and having no Form Is in my small opinion, not about kata. Being good at kata requires that you attempt to recreate another person's interpretation of reality...what that person, the originator of the kata, would do in combat. Following the Krisnamurti philosophy Bruce rejected authority. Who should tell him how to respond in combat?
Having No form means that my technique is not limited to one and only one way of delivery. I am not limited to the shaolin "way/form", nor the Tang soo do "way/form", not the boxer's "way/form" of delivering my jab. I am not even limited to the JKD "form" of delivering my jab. I am No (particular) way/form and therefore I can be and adapt to all ways/forms. Has nothing to do with kata. Has everything to do with the way you deliver or "form" your technique. To be JKD you must be free of the limitation imposed by "forming" the opinion that I can do it only this way. To be JKD you must free your mind of conforming to predetermined actions/responses.
Classical arts teach exactly the opposite. Classical forms of martial arts (not talking about kata), classical, arts/styles/ways teach one way...the best way... the master's way...conform to the master and his way or risk missing the promotion. Be like water....... is this not like water?
To arrive at these conclusions I had to reject what others had said. I started with no "formed" opinions. Absorbed what was useful to me and now I have contributed what is uniquely my own. Now it is yours.
Jerry Beasley
JKD Writer