matt.m, While I agree that there are a lot of people who, perhaps, over hype BJJ, I have to step in, because I find you have chosen to let the pendulum swing too far in the other direction in your response. Let me respond to some of your posts (I'm taking bits from two of your previous posts on this thread):
After visiting Rodrigo Vaghi in St. L, who is a multi time world champion and 3rd dan under Rickson Gracie agreed with me that BJJ is a combat sport. It's main focus is wait till the opponent takes you down so you can begin your magic.
Yes Judo teaches a ton of ground fighting, however they are taught as followups to the throw that took their opponent down.
For instance the following techniques are an example: Floating hip throw to ground arm bar.
Rodrigo told me himself that he doesn't teach much on how to fall, nor off balance from the standing.
Whereas in arts like hapkido and judo, if you are on the ground then you are more than likely loosing.
True, BJJ spends little time working takedowns. Should we work more? Maybe, maybe not, depends on why we are training. I can tell you that in my experience, if I want it to go to the ground, it most likely will. I find that the simplest stuff works on the majority of people out there.
Oh, and it's fine that in Hapkido and Judo if you end up on the ground you are probably losing, that's just not the case with BJJ.
The person who taught Helio was a student of the Japanese national champ as well as Jigoro Kano's student.
So really to me and from what I have seen of BJJ it is a watered down version of Traditional Kodokan Judo.
BJJ is a good art yes, but as compared to Judo it is nothing but 1/3 of curriculum. I don't know, I just think that BJJ is "The best pancakes ever made" all thanks to the UFC. However one of the creators of the UFC got beat at UFC 3, and lost to Matt Hughes, a wrestler.
So, really to me and from what I have seen of Judo, as taught today, it is nothing more than "1/3 the curriculum" of pre-war Kodokan Judo. How many clubs today regularly practice Judo Kata, and striking? How many truly spend a good portion of their newaza time learning to actually finish their opponents rather than holding and escaping from pins and how to stall for the stand up.
And before you respond that there are clubs that spend time on these things, remember that there are plenty of BJJ clubs that work the things that you thing BJJ is weak at.
I would love to see Karo Paryisian vs. one of the Gracie's, I don't care who in a gi match and see who won that one. I mean Karo is a great cage fighter and he stuck only to his judo roots.
Of course it depends on the rules, but if you let me pick any Gracie, I pick Roger, and I'm sorry, but it just wouldn't be fair.
Japanese JiuJitsu is amazing, like the founding Kwans in Hapkido. Brazilian Jiu Jitsu to Japanese JiuJitsu is comparing an apple to an orange. It is a dumbed down version of "Favorite Techniques" by the gracies.
Every Judoka has their own set of techniques they use most and that works for them. They know these moves inside and out, know how to set them up from all kinds of places. The best could probably write volumes on small portions of Judo's game. That to me doesn't equate with "dumbed down". That to me is specialization.
I will say this with certainty that in a fight, not a cage......unless we are both in gi's, there is no blue belt on the planet that will beat me.
Sorry, just my opinion.
Being a bit arrogant aren't we now? There are a lot of blue belts on this planet, and every man is a sum of their overall life experience, not just their BJJ training.