Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think Taekwondo will be better as a full contact martial art using the knock down rule? Or is it too violent? Thoughts comments?
Bottom line, any competition for martial arts should be as real as possible...with safety in mind, of course...otherwise, what's the point?
i disagree here on two points. first everyone has different level of commitment to the martial arts. i worked out for a while with a bjj guy who quit boxing because he got a job as a microbiology tech. he looked though a microscope all day, & a bad enough black eye could put him out of work. another guy i know is a watchmaker; a hand injury does the same to him (he is an excellent judo & jujitsuka though). i think people with these type of considerations still should have martial arts to compete in.
the other point is that i view martial sports as opportunities to develop a specialty in your martial arts training. judo specializing in throwing, wrestling in pinning, tkd in high kicking, boxing in...well boxing, but you get my idea. even point fighting can be valuable if you view it as a tool to learn how to land the first effective strike & disregard all the slappy-slap junk that wouldn't really hurt anybody.
i think the real danger lies in when people start manipulating the rules to win rather than focusing on the intended specialization.
karate has room for both knockdown & point tournaments, i can't imagine why tkd couldn't do the same.
I agree. Why not both forms of competition. It gives practitioners the best of both worlds, if that's what they want. I mean, after all, it's all a consumers market right? Why not a buffet of choices?
That's true. But, to play devil's advocate, if the rules for the competition were full contact, and the rules are explained in detail to anyone interested in competing, then the competitor would be aware of the risk and make their judgement accordingly.
no problem here.
I can see the practicality of point fighting as being the first person to pull off an effective strike. The problem with that is that even if you pull off an effective strike before your opponent, you still need to be ready to defend yourself incase your strike was not effective enough. The only way you can be sure if your strike is that effective is to use full contact. This applies especially to the tournements with the rules of stopping the action after each point that is scored.
Even for continuous action sparring, how can you figure the ratio of how many points should be awarded for how effective a landed technique should be, which is what the case is if the rules don't allow full contact. With light to moderate contact, how can you tell that the sidekick that you just landed to your opponent's midsection would have been effective enough to stop your fully or even partially? Just because a kick or punch connects doesn't mean that it's effective. The effectiveness of strikes is 50% location, 50% force. So, compete in a ruleset that takes away the 50% for force, and you're only left with 50% effectiveness.
we agree here too. but like i said, not everyone is able or willing to compete in something where they take high power strikes. but the greater prestige is almost always given to higher-contact events. people who don't want to get knocked around too badly should still have something to play, but they should understand the limitations & differences within that ruleset.
I agree 110% here. And that's the problem with having rules for something that is most effective with no rules...people will start to manipulate them.
:asian:
I agree here too. The only problem that I see with this is that TKD already gets watered down enough because of point tournements...maybe changing the rules back to reflect the art itself would change the training practices.
i see what you're saying, but a full-scale conversion to knockdown TKD would lead to a mass exodus. part of why point fighting is popular is because it hurts less than knockdown rules. i think knockdown TKD as a division of competition would give the art more respect, but i don't think that it should replace point fighting. i think rather a restructuring of point fighting would be better. for instance, penalties for dropping your defense after scoring, not counting pitty-pat strikes, that sort of thing. like you said, you can't be 100% positive something would be effective with the power removed, but that's part of the comprimise. removing point fighting would just cause a mass exodus to karate schools that practice point fighting. it's not my thing, but some folks really like it.
I would say that this all depends on why a person chooses to compete. Do they want to test their skill against other different martial artists, or do they want to compete for bragging rights and a trophy?
Point sparring waters down the art to the point where it's barely recognizable, and then the competitors capitalize on the weakness of the ruleset to win...in other words, they "game the game". At that point, whatever they are competing in ceases to be TKD and becomes a game.
Do you think Taekwondo will be better as a full contact martial art using the knock down rule? Or is it too violent? Thoughts comments?
At it's core the origins of TKD involves the use of full contact hard violence, that's what attracted me to the art. But in order to keep it one of the most popular MAs now for everyone, of course it needs to be deluted in order to make it more acceptable and accessable. That gives other non-Taekwondo practitioners ammunition to bad mouth my beloved art, and maybe rightly so...Do you think Taekwondo will be better as a full contact martial art using the knock down rule? Or is it too violent? Thoughts comments?
How about full contact with the option of wearing protect gear?
I remember kick boxing being banned for one year in Ontario, Canada because it was too brutal too many people were getting severely injured.
Good point, class sparring and competition sparring could and should be different in terms of contact. B ut if competition sparring were to be full contact, then there would have to be some aspects of your training that involves full contact, either in class or perhaps a separate class intended just for those who want to spar full contact.The original post doesn't say whether the question considers competition or in class sparring, so I would say in class should remain as is. As for competitions, I don't have a problem with putting it out there. If people want to spar full contact no pads, let 'em go for it. But not everyone trains to do competitions, so I see no real need for it in 'regular' classes; sparring specific classes, maybe.
To be succinct, I'm fine with it being available as long as it isn't forced on anyone at any point.