If you don't mind, my character is already built. I am nearly 48 years old, my character is what it is at this point. I am a man and not a child. The ritual connects me at a basic level to my warrior spirit, and I am sure it can help build character in younger people, but I am, character-wise, a finished (flawed) product.
Yeah, I'd be uncomfortable with that as well. "Call me Master!" What, are you kidding? Sensei means teacher and it is traditional. The discipline and ritual we use in our dojo is traditional, and a shadow of how it once was, so I don't see it as asking too much of students.
I snipped your words above because what you say resonates with me - I have had friends who objected to military service using similar terms. Yes, we bow - is that the same as 'scraping'? You make it seem so disgusting, as if I am giving my person lesser value than the person I am bowing to. If I saw it that way, I wouldn't want to do it either, but I don't. Please note that when a person bows to sensei, sensei bows back. Respect - and it is a two-way street. It is no different (to me) than a salute in the military. I salute officers - they salute me. Respect given and returned.
We're all flawed, that's what makes us interesting.
I re-read what I had written and I realize that it comes across a bit harsher than I intended, or at least a bit more judgmental in places. Let me give a bit more context as our views are not so far apart as they seem.
By the character building remark, I should probably say a more "hollistic" approach perhaps? Many traditional schools don't have as their chief aim the end result of producing combat athletes and fighters, opting instead to concentrate on the persons development of "character". They are promoting the tertiary benefits of martial art training such as discipline, comraderie, and other social factors. There's nothing wrong with that, but I am of the opinion that those things happen as a result of hard, realistic training and not because of artificialy constructed traditions that have more to do with military culture than fighting training. Given the way that most Japanese/Okinawan arts were filtered through returning servicemen and taught to the Japanese military, the wholesale adoption of things like standing in lines in class(formations), standing in formation by rank(heirachy of rank/chain of command- why do you obey the directives of students that out rank you if they are not the instructor?), lots of bowing(saluting), flags and pictures of dead guys(paegentry), ritualized behaviors upon promotion(NCO Induction Ceremonies, Wetting Down of LT's, Blood Rank), and recitation of the dojo kun( Ranger Creed, Soldier's Creed, NCO Creed, and the like), it is easy to see why you find the surroundings familiar and comforting.
How much of that was traditionaly practiced in Okinawa prior to karate being exported to a militaristic Japan, then on to the States after WWII?
A student addressing me as Sensei, doesnt offend me. I won't call just anyone of black belt rank by that honorific, they would actually have to be my teacher. I only have the one left. The other two have passed on. At the point I am at on my journey, I don't really need an instructor in the same manner that you do and that is what colors both of our perceptions of this issue. Where I am at, my skillset is already pretty well ingrained. I need more peer counseling type input and feedback as opposed to a teacher instilling the art. I know this sounds arrogant as all kinds of hell and I don't intend it to be, but after doing this for 25 years my perspective of the art is bit different. I know how to do my art very well, I don't need to be taught karate. Sometimes, I need tips. Given what I just stated, I think that refering to my peers by their names, or with "Sir" or "Ma'am" is sufficient to show respect, certainly without being disrespectful of the one remaining person that actually qualifies to be my "Sensei". I would ask for no more in return.
See, I've worked with this person for the better part of the 25 years that I have been involved in the arts and I think that the sort of respect that I hold for that person has to actually be earned, not just assumed by someone because they happen to be a black belt. I think that for a person to be considered a teacher, they have to know that student. I think they have to have a developed relationship with them. Not just be a black belt.
I don't think that you are giving yourself lesser value by showing respect to the people with which you train. No offense was intended, but I wonder if you would show a boxing coach that same respect? How about a guitar teacher? You might(and probably would from what I can tell about you from your posts), but most martial artist wouldn't, in my experience. This is where I have the problem. I am a godan, a recently promoted one in fact, in shotokan and kobujutsu. Should I be given any more respect, bowed to, or treated with any more deference, than the guy that coaches my wife's softball team? How about a firearms instructor?
Some would say yes.
I am not one of those.
We have, fundamentally, the same job, either producing athletes or combatants but perhaps because of the exoticism associated with the martial arts, it is assumed that I should be shown loftier deference. Personally, I would be more polite to the guy who teaches people to shoot.
In my time in the arts I have witness some unscrupulous behaviors on the part of instructors towards their students. I've encounters more than a few megalomaniacal asshats that thrived on the bit of social power that teaching karate had given them. I ran across one too many dojo that was set up like a little personality cult with the teacher as a little tin god, prosideing over his kingdom. I've also noticed that there is a distinct lack of this kind of crap in places that train and compete in heavy contact. Seems as though, in places where you actually have to prove your worth through performance on the mat or in the ring, the trend towards rampant egotism and the "Bow to your sensei!" type crap doesn't appear with as much frequency. Also seems to me that when, in those type of schools, the students are respectfull it is genuine and honest because that respect is earned and not just an enforced pattern of behavior. In those cases, I don't find that sort of thing demeaning at all.
We've had lots of threads around these parts on rank. As martial artists, we love to discuss that topic too much I think. Who is wearing what, who promoted who, how long was that guy that rank before he got promoted, so on and so forth...
Now me, I couldn't care less what a person ties around their waist. I gauge the person on who they are, how they move, how they conduct them selves. I feel that same way about all the bowing and such. IF its important to you in your school, then knock youself out, but the belt around someones waist, or the fact that they have had the title of "Sensei" bestowed on them by someone, does not automaticaly entitle them to respect. They still gotta conduct themselves in a way deserving of it, and a major portion of that, as I see it, is in how they treat less experienced martial artists.
Less experienced martial artists and not suborodinates. I am not better than people that have been training for less time that me. I am more skillfull at performing karate, but I am not bestowed with any more inherent value or authority than any other martial artist. I'm just further along on the path than most, not as far as some, and I happen to be one of the people with a talent for helping others along said path. That description is fitting for any martial arts instructor. Anything they assume beyond that, is entirely permissive on the part of the student. All of the authority any teacher has can be stripped from him in an instant by a student. All that student has to do is quit. In light of this, I am amazed at how many teacher behave poorly towards their charges.
Nor have I ever felt 'talked down to' by a sensei or senior student in my dojo. My seniors know more than I do about isshinryu. They share their wisdom. I listen and try to learn. If I have a question or disagree, I ask. I am never browbeat or made to feel inferior. I'm a 48-year-old Marine. You think I'd put up with being made to feel inferior? I just don't quite understand how 'respectful' becomes 'subservient'.
I mean, I went to a friend's house who is from another culture. He asked me to take my shoes off in his house. I did, and what, I'm subservient to him? I'm bowing and scraping? I'm someone considering myself inferior to him? I'm just showing him respect for his rules in his house. If it bothered me that much, I could leave, I guess.
Since I got carried away in the last few paragrapgh, I kind of addressed these points but I think that I should re-state that you found a good school. I've been to places where it is considered rude to question what you're being taught.
You last sentence summs it up nicely. We all have differnet levels of tolerance for what is acceptable. I know what sort of things I'm cool with in a training environment and I naturally gravitate towards it. Nowadays that enviornment is much more boxing gym then traditional dojo. Not a slight to those that perfer otherwise, and apologies if what I posted was taken thusly.
I will say this - if I were already a karate adept, and I wanted merely to learn some this or that to round out my skill set, I might well want to seek out a teacher who just 'cut to the chase' and taught me what I wanted to learn. But I am a mere beginner, and I am on a Path, and I am patient. All things in time.
This shows a lot of wisdom. I think that too many people are in too much of a hurry in the martial arts, patients is an important aspect. My guys train hard, and I don't hand out rank easily. I've lost several students over the years because of this. Thats fine. I'd rather train a few that I can be proud of than hang black belts on a bunch that I'm ashamed of in pursuit of money or for the gratification of having lots of names on my family tree. I wish more people looked at things the way you do when they are starting out. As advanced practitioners, to sample things and expand your knowledge by working with a variety of sources is a great thing but I think that it is a bad idea to do so until you have a solid base.
I can see we're different. The military has history and traditions, and I understand them. So does the Catholic church. So when a dojo that adheres to traditions asks me to follow those traditions when in the dojo, I have no problem with it.
Not so different. Traditions have their place, I just don't don't think that they are as important to training as you appear to. I think that the following traditions can be beneficial but we should be honest with ourselves about the origon of those traditions and the purpose of them before we decide to play along.
To be fair, though, I subscribe to the "When in Rome", philosophy when I am visiting another school. With very few exceptions I will follow what ever social customs they have in their school. I think it would be rude to do otherwise.
Thank you - I feel it is a good fit. And I completely understand what you're saying, and agree, with the minor exception of what appears to be a belief that following tradition = being subservient. I just don't agree.
After that long winded and rambing post, I hope I was better able to clear up my position. I've been involved in this discussion before and it is a tough one to have on a posting board without coming across as an arrogant jerk, and if I did so I apologize. Just kinda responding tou your post and venting a bit.
Mark