Danjo
Master Black Belt
To answer the original question, yes I Have used SKK for real, it worked just fine.
For instance? (Not being confrontational, just curious).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To answer the original question, yes I Have used SKK for real, it worked just fine.
Yes, you gave us alternate targets to strike with that one (and some others). I always liked SKK interms of comparing it to Shotokan due to it's versatility. However, I do wish that they had more realistic attacks to counter.
You do realize that you were something of an anomaly in the USSD world don't you? It's the reason I quit when you left.
I think Danjo has a great point that i have addressed only indirectly. We the students must work / test/ practice our supposed skills in as realistic a manner as possible. If your instructor is not doing this and you do not want to find another or cannot then do it yourself. I am sure you can find at least one other who thinks like you and get started. This applies to all styles. Make it work...it is your training after all not anyone else's.
BTW 3 works just fine if the attacker is bent over...it flows like aikido or it can stop start like some hawaiian kempo but it works
Respectfully,
Marlon
Yes, you gave us alternate targets to strike with that one (and some others). I always liked SKK interms of comparing it to Shotokan due to it's versatility. However, I do wish that they had more realistic attacks to counter.
You do realize that you were something of an anomaly in the USSD world don't you? It's the reason I quit when you left.
It's also the reason why I left. I gave too much and got nothing in return...no, I take that back. They gave me an experience I will never forget. I learned from it...grown...and all that mess.
Your not becoming a buddha head are you?
Ussd's version of a buddha head, yes. Meaning, I will teach martial arts AND have a professional career.
The only way I've been able to make it work properly off of a right-cross is to use the left hand to check the attacker's punch and hold onto it while executing the groin/bladder punch and then yanking the attacker by the arm into a modified right backfist over the arm into the temple. Otherwise, the attacker is in the wrong position for the follow-up moves.
The way you are describing 3 is the way i have always done it. If the control of the attacking arm is good enough you push the arm down bringing the head down a little with it into the Modified Back fist. We also try to strike under the ear when we reach around for the take down. All i can say is i am curious to some techniques and how most of the other branches of Kempo i have seen come from different attacks. Through searching i have found many techniques were meant originally to be taught off of the right cross, the 1 -2 punch, kicks and so on. In my school we teach combination one off of a right front kick and then a right, left hook. All we did was change some of the timing the rest of the technique is identical. Also someone brought up Combo 4 - the original 4 brought over from SGM Pesare does not jump on the groin, face or shoulders. After you blast the guy in the face with the kick you wait to see where he lands, run up the side of him drop your knee on his face or collar bone and strike the neck. I was told this technique was created by Prof. Walter Godin. Has anyone else heard this? Things changed over the years for reasons only the people who changed them can know. I see the next generation of SKK teachers breaking the mold of these teachings but keeping the core. Right straight step through for every combination? not in my school, not any more, not ever again.
Jesse
The way you are describing 3 is the way i have always done it. If the control of the attacking arm is good enough you push the arm down bringing the head down a little with it into the Modified Back fist. We also try to strike under the ear when we reach around for the take down. All i can say is i am curious to some techniques and how most of the other branches of Kempo i have seen come from different attacks. Through searching i have found many techniques were meant originally to be taught off of the right cross, the 1 -2 punch, kicks and so on. In my school we teach combination one off of a right front kick and then a right, left hook. All we did was change some of the timing the rest of the technique is identical. Also someone brought up Combo 4 - the original 4 brought over from SGM Pesare does not jump on the groin, face or shoulders. After you blast the guy in the face with the kick you wait to see where he lands, run up the side of him drop your knee on his face or collar bone and strike the neck. I was told this technique was created by Prof. Walter Godin. Has anyone else heard this? Things changed over the years for reasons only the people who changed them can know. I see the next generation of SKK teachers breaking the mold of these teachings but keeping the core. Right straight step through for every combination? not in my school, not any more, not ever again.
Jesse
Sounds like you guys think for yourselves and are creative in your approach.
I train in shaolin kempo for many years. I now learn and teach kosho Ryu Kempo. But my base of teaching is in shaolin kempo karate. I just now add the pricaples of kosho to all my comb, kempo's, etc to the shaolin kempo karate.
i look for all the things in my pinions and katas.
more than the punch, block, kick.
the throwing arts, escapeing arts, controlling arts, ETC.
its all there just some, not all Villiar teachers never learned the things inside of the forms...
I now teach the shaolin kempo karate to all my students show them the old way it was tought.( TO ME)
and how I now teach the same thing just with some Kosho idears and the teq now work that much better. FOR ME
not to say it won't for others. but what i do see is that my students are growing faster that the other shaolin kempo school in 2 towns away...
not in rank color just in skills and info...
mu 2 cents
steve
The only way I've been able to make it work properly off of a right-cross is to use the left hand to check the attacker's punch and hold onto it while executing the groin/bladder punch and then yanking the attacker by the arm into a modified right backfist over the arm into the temple. Otherwise, the attacker is in the wrong position for the follow-up moves.
The way you are describing 3 is the way i have always done it. If the control of the attacking arm is good enough you push the arm down bringing the head down a little with it into the Modified Back fist. We also try to strike under the ear when we reach around for the take down. All i can say is i am curious to some techniques and how most of the other branches of Kempo i have seen come from different attacks. Through searching i have found many techniques were meant originally to be taught off of the right cross, the 1 -2 punch, kicks and so on. In my school we teach combination one off of a right front kick and then a right, left hook. All we did was change some of the timing the rest of the technique is identical. Also someone brought up Combo 4 - the original 4 brought over from SGM Pesare does not jump on the groin, face or shoulders. After you blast the guy in the face with the kick you wait to see where he lands, run up the side of him drop your knee on his face or collar bone and strike the neck. I was told this technique was created by Prof. Walter Godin. Has anyone else heard this? Things changed over the years for reasons only the people who changed them can know. I see the next generation of SKK teachers breaking the mold of these teachings but keeping the core. Right straight step through for every combination? not in my school, not any more, not ever again.
Jesse
Its not so much that all the techs come toguether for you, but that you become more tuned into the moment.From what I understand from my sensei is that it all starts to come together at the green belt level. Up until then, you are really just learning the movements and learning to flow. At green and above, you are then learning to put the power behind what you have already learned.
I do understand what you mean by some of the moves to be a little choreographed, but I trust sensei, and if she tells me that it will come together later I believe her. She is quite amazing to watch.
The way you are describing 3 is the way i have always done it. If the control of the attacking arm is good enough you push the arm down bringing the head down a little with it into the Modified Back fist. We also try to strike under the ear when we reach around for the take down. All i can say is i am curious to some techniques and how most of the other branches of Kempo i have seen come from different attacks. Through searching i have found many techniques were meant originally to be taught off of the right cross, the 1 -2 punch, kicks and so on. In my school we teach combination one off of a right front kick and then a right, left hook. All we did was change some of the timing the rest of the technique is identical. Also someone brought up Combo 4 - the original 4 brought over from SGM Pesare does not jump on the groin, face or shoulders. After you blast the guy in the face with the kick you wait to see where he lands, run up the side of him drop your knee on his face or collar bone and strike the neck. I was told this technique was created by Prof. Walter Godin. Has anyone else heard this? Things changed over the years for reasons only the people who changed them can know. I see the next generation of SKK teachers breaking the mold of these teachings but keeping the core. Right straight step through for every combination? not in my school, not any more, not ever again.
Jesse