isshinryuronin
Senior Master
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 2,481
- Reaction score
- 2,690
Ed Parker developed a great system and some outstanding black belts, but for various reasons (won't get into details) they broke away from his organization fairly early on. The Tracy brothers are an example (but even they split from each other), but there are several others. Commercial success was the number one consideration for many. Indeed, Parker set up his system for the American market. There was some aggressive marketing amongst the different factions leading to an increasing number of Kenpo schools, as well as some real conflicts. Parker tried to stem this in part by slightly changing his curicculum so the other guys could not claim to be teaching the "real" kenpo. Parker definitely wanted to be paid by those using his name and brand. He relished his position (which he earned) as the top guy.
Given all this, a lot of time has passed as Flying Crane has mentioned. Can you imagine the old Okinawan masters' families demanding payment from all the gojuryu, isshinryu, etc. dojos that use a certain patch or name of style? It would be seen as quite unseemly. At least in the traditional Oriental culture. Here is where the difference is in my opinion. Ed Parker's Kenpo was AMERICAN kenpo and this carried through to the American mindset of profit and way of doing business. Parker was the first and biggest martial art business mogul. For better and worse, his legacy is what it is.
(I managed/owned a Kenpo school during 1973-74. My partner was a business "consultant" for Ed Parker, though had worked for rival factions as well. I had several personal contacts with Parker in teacher/student, business and social contexts. By no means was I close to him or privy to much more than discussed here.)
Given all this, a lot of time has passed as Flying Crane has mentioned. Can you imagine the old Okinawan masters' families demanding payment from all the gojuryu, isshinryu, etc. dojos that use a certain patch or name of style? It would be seen as quite unseemly. At least in the traditional Oriental culture. Here is where the difference is in my opinion. Ed Parker's Kenpo was AMERICAN kenpo and this carried through to the American mindset of profit and way of doing business. Parker was the first and biggest martial art business mogul. For better and worse, his legacy is what it is.
(I managed/owned a Kenpo school during 1973-74. My partner was a business "consultant" for Ed Parker, though had worked for rival factions as well. I had several personal contacts with Parker in teacher/student, business and social contexts. By no means was I close to him or privy to much more than discussed here.)