Kenpodoc said:
Ed Parker is both the progenitor and the founder of EPAK. So by both definitions Chow is not in the Lineage of EPK.
Jeff
From Miriam Webster online:
Main Entry: proĀ·genĀ·iĀ·tor
Pronunciation: prO-'je-n&-t&r, pr&-
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French progeniteur, from Latin progenitor, from progignere to beget, from pro- forth + gignere to beget -- more at KIN
1 a : an ancestor in the direct line : FOREFATHER b : a biologically ancestral form
2 : PRECURSOR, ORIGINATOR <progenitors of socialist ideas -- Times Literary Supplement>
And
Main Entry: preĀ·curĀ·sor
Pronunciation: pri-'k&r-s&r, 'prE-"
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English precursoure, from Latin praecursor, from praecurrere to run before, from prae- pre- + currere to run -- more at CURRENT
1 a : one that precedes and indicates the approach of another b : PREDECESSOR
And
Main Entry: foreĀ·faĀ·ther
Pronunciation: -"fƤ-[th]&r, -"f[a']-
Function: noun
1 : ANCESTOR 1a
2 : a person of an earlier period and common heritage
I conclude that Chow is Parker's Progenitor, Predecessor and Precursor.
Furthermore...if Parker is the "Father" of American Kenpo, then Chow is the "Forefather" which clearly puts him in the lineage of EPAK.