Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Happens every day in the academyFor real tho?
Yes, 100%. Women can be very fierce fighters so yes, a woman can definitely beat a man.For real tho?
Yes.For real tho?
And yet either of the Williams sisters could easily beat me in tennis, which would be more apt considering OP's asking if a woman could beat a man in a fight, as a blanket question. (Technically he's asking about multiple women, but I'm guessing that was a typo).In general terms, I wouldn't bet on it. Think back to when both Williams sisters played a game against Karsten Braasch - who was ranked 203 in men's tennis. He easily dominated both. I remember reading a poll where the majority seem to agree that any all state boy's high school basketball team would slaughter any WNBA team.
Granted, these aren't instances of fighting or combat sports (but we CAN go there, if we want to talk about transgenders), but they're things where physical fitness has a huge effect on the outcome.
Some women can beat some men.
Some men can beat some other men.
Rickson taught my wife to roll. Worked an RNC with her every single day. You expose your back you’re taking a nap.
For real.
Sounds about right.There's a poll out there that 17% of people think they could beat a chimpanzee in a fight, while unarmed.
I have some serious doubts as to whether or not everyone who answered that poll have all been exposed to the same information pertaining to the strength of chimpanzees. If not, then that 17% simply doesn't know any better. If so, then that's another conversation.Sounds about right.
If you look into the history of idiocy, it's about 1 in 5.I have some serious doubts as to whether or not everyone who answered that poll have all been exposed to the same information pertaining to the strength of chimpanzees. If not, then that 17% simply doesn't know any better. If so, then that's another conversation.
Oh definitely. There are people who don't know that chimpanzees are all that different than capuchins. Which is why a poll on the publics perception is not the best to go by.I have some serious doubts as to whether or not everyone who answered that poll have all been exposed to the same information pertaining to the strength of chimpanzees. If not, then that 17% simply doesn't know any better. If so, then that's another conversation.
Or is it?Oh definitely. There are people who don't know that chimpanzees are all that different than capuchins. Which is why a poll on the publics perception is not the best to go by.