That goes back to the philosophical question of another thread as to whether MAās would be better off with or without the philosophies attached. As a Christian, I could absolutely care less about the original philosophy of a particular MA, including my own. My GM, who created the style that Iām involved in was, by all intents and purposes an agnostic at best. I believe philosophy can be part of a MA, but shouldnāt define whether it is a MA or not. The MMA philosophy, depending on the individual is to win in the ring and not if it balances with the universe. Maybe.The following page has some points worth consideration when defining and understanding the terms martial art:
Here are two paragraphs which caught my attention:Welcome to Our Martial Arts Blog
We welcome our readers to our newest adventure ā a blog about martial arts. Learn more about martial arts and the blog itself here.www.24fightingchickens.com
1) Letās start off by dissecting the term āmartial artā. Martial is something relating to war and it comes from the name Mars, given to the Roman god of war. The term āmartial artā emerged around the 14th century to describe European fighting arts, now known as Historical European martial arts.
2) Every martial art you can find is not simply a system of techniques and their application, but a philosophy to live by. You cannot ignore the moral teachings of the creators and the masters if you ever want to perfect a martial art; there is no martial art without them.
Last edited: