Corporal Hicks said:
You seem to be getting your facts wrong. No offence meant but who said that he beat the hell out of some poor guy just because he beat him at Chi Sao? It just seems like your one of these people who take up the rumors that are heard and use it here without evidence. He didnt want to be a movie star either, he simply wanted to show the beauty of his Chinese culture and he knew the best way to do this was through movies.
What ever his reason for wanting it, he wanted it!
I've read loads of books on him, seen all his films, seen both sides of the story. I'm not suprised there are so many rumors of him being a thug because the martial art community and the so called masters resented his views. Therefore there are going to be stories about him beating students, to make him sound worse.
So because you've read books and seen films, you have a different opinion. The funny part is, you have yours and I have mine, but most of the books and films that you have based your opinion on, are probably the same ones I have based my opinion on.
As for a man who broke down the prejudice in movie making thats hardly the action of a thug.
Doesn't say he was or wasn't. Just says he acheived some of what he set out to do.
He was a big head and I think if I posses the power and skill that he did I would probably be too.
I dont think that he would have wanted you to call him a master anyway, that would not be the way of Jeet Kune Do, as he spoke himself he is always the student as he is always learning. He is only the master of the techniques in which he has learned, he is not a master of other people.
He couldn't be a master of other people, if he wasn't a master of himself.
He considered himself a Martial Artist first not an actor you know, your facts consist of various rumours i.e. he was a womaniser, he was a thug (? justify that?), he beat up students (what a load of crap).
I'm sorry, I didn't say he was a womaniser! I don't know that he was. But if you insist.... :idunno:
I'm not sure what you mean... Do my facts consist of rumours, or is it that my rumours consist of fact.....?
That for example that he beat somebody who beat him at Chi Sao? If It was true, do you know the whole story? Did he hit him for the hell of it, it was he provoked or attacked first? Or maybe your refering to the black belt who challenged him in his school in which he did beat the crap out of then chased him around the building. Believe me I would do that to if somebody comes in to one of my WC classes preaching that it crap. I wouldnt wait for my instructor I would go for it. Challenge sure, but to try show somebody up in their own school isnt on. Anyway thats what made BL change his idea of WC.
No no, go back and read again. I didn't say he was beaten at Chi Sao, I said the newbie got one in. This is actually documented in Bruce Lee Fighting Spirit, by Bruce Thomas.
Actually, it was the fact that when he beat the challenger, he was so puffed out, and his hands hurt so much from punching the other guy in the head that he knew he had to find a
fighting system that was more effective than what he had. He shouldn't have blamed it on WC, because he really only had a beginners knowledge of WC.
No proof of him being a good fighter?
What the hell are you talking about? There are video clips of him fighting in black and white movies, him sparring versus black belts. I wouldnt take the films as an example because they are simply films and are biased..
Your facts consists of stupid rumours put about by the 'so-called masters' of Martial Arts who didnt like his ideas because they were new, they were simple and they worked.
So on the one hand there is proof of him being a good fighter, that being video clips of him "Sparring". But as you say, they're not really proof because they are biased. :idunno: Now I'm confused.
Sure he's not as great as alot of people say. His death made him into a legend which is exaggerated with most people who die during their prime. But he's not the man you are making him out to be.
He's not what I make him out to be or what you make him out to be.... Is that what you said, or was it... no wait um :idunno:
I'm sorry but I'm fed up of people throwing their weight about a subject they are no or limited and biased knowledge of..
Man, are you getting frustrated, or did your keyboard malfunction??
Why would you get "fed up" over something like this, when your knowledge of the guy comes from pretty much the same place as mine. The guy's dead, did you know him before he died? Is he related to you in some way, or did he just appear to you and tell you exactly what is truth and what is fiction about him? Oh no, wait!! That was in the movie, NO RETREAT - NO SURRENDER.
Dude, get a life!!
--Dave