Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
May be you didn't say that but that was what you have "quoted" in your 1st post,I don't recall saying that????
And so what was that? Well, a lot of it is technological superiority. I’m not saying the techniques of Aikido are superior to those of Judo. I’m saying that he was using a technology, basically a form of standing grappling. As soon as somebody goes in to reach for you, you blend with it. In Judo, you just grab each other and then you begin. But because he was working at a different range of motion, but really no different than Royce Gracie in the first couple UFCs. Because he was working in that altered range of combat that the Judo guy wasn’t familiar with, he had, clearly, the upper hand.
So, I think that goes a long way in explaining a lot of the stories of Aikido being able to best Judo in a few challenge matches in the early days of the art.
that is allowed here. there is only 1 style that's off limitsMay be you didn't say that but that was what you have "quoted" in your 1st post,
Only if you are not interested in making logical arguments. This is an example of a hasty generalization.Within that video, yeah it does.
Instead of making excuses for the Aikidoka getting beaten, maybe we could discuss why a 4th dan in Aikido got beaten so easily by a mediocre grappler?
Even when I have showed hi exactly what he asked for (Aikido trained in a live manner in the Steven Segal Black belt test video) he still finds a way to claim it isn't evidence of anything (reminds me of another group that likes to shift the goal posts whenever they are shown evidence)."the rest of the grappling community at large" has basically already decided what they want to believe and is now wading hip deep in a sea of Confirmation Bias.
If you can't stop a takedown in a dojo, you're probably not going to stop a takedown in the streets either.
Only if you are not interested in making logical arguments. This is an example of a hasty generalization.
Maybe you should actually read the video description before you decide ig the grappler is mediocre or not.
"Grandmaster of Turkish Submission Wrestling and head of the Marital Kinetics Academy, Levent Altunbas,"
This video would seem to show that BJJ is just as inept against Turkish Submission Wresltling as Aikido is:
But hey show me a video of a BJJ practitioner defeating a Turkish Submission Wrestler and we will all be happy.
Male Novice 17 YO 61kg Nogi
A. Al Zaini (544) martial kinetics
I have no clue nor can determine what this thread pertains to???
I should really like to know what it would benefit me -or you MMA practitioners- if I were to get in a ring and try to do nothing except my Aikido?
I wish to ask those of you that compete in MMA, if I were to take this step above and get beaten in that MMA bout staying strictly with my own art Aikido, what would it either suggest or proove 1.to you, and 2.to me?? thank you xx
Hilarious. All you need to do is check out the results from the AFBJJ panics to see that Al-Ziani won the 17 yo novice (read: White belt) division.
A good accomplishment to be sure, but definitely not in the same league as what occurred at that Aikido academy.
If you can't perform a takedown in a dojo, using Judo, on a Tai chi practitioner you're probably not going to be able to perform a takedown in the streets either:
With the right amount of bias you can draw just about any conclusion you want from videos
So according to you you can't base an argument from a single short YouTube video, unless it is a BJJ/Judo/other grappling art practitioner who is doing the winning?
So you have to look up and search through dozens of documents to disprove the ineffectiveness of BJJ but for Aikido it only takes an 86 second video.
Interesting.
Wouldn't you agree that a 4th dan BB in Aikido is far more proficient in their art than a 17 year old white belt?
I would certainly hope so.
LoL dozens of documents? I just had to look up the results of 2011 AFBJJ pan pacs.
Which reinforces my point "With the right amount of bias you can draw just about any conclusion you want from videos".You're kidding right? That video was about as real as Santa Claus.
On the first video you have a grand master and head of the school versus a 4th Dan. In the Pan Pacs you have two beginners.
There are 42 documents in that link, that is at least 3 dozens.
Which reinforces my point "With the right amount of bias you can draw just about any conclusion you want from videos".
And you can clearly see in the other video that the Aikido 4th dan wasn't really trying to resist the Turkish Wrestler.Except you can watch that video and see very clearly that the Judoka wasn't really trying to throw the Tai Chi practitioner.
And then look through the 42 documents to find it.Uh, you just click the 2011 AFBJJ results, and scroll down until you find his name.
And you think you know what that reason is.If the head of Martial Kinetics wishes to really make waves, he can visit pretty much any Bjj school he wants, bring along a video crew and grapple with a Bjj black belt.
There's a very good reason why he hasn't done that.
And you can clearly see in the other video that the Aikido 4th dan wasn't really trying to resist the Turkish Wrestler.
And you think you know what that reason is.