- Thread Starter
- #61
Is head movement truly necessary?As for head movement, I've always found that a good boxing coach has a better handle on that than any other I've experienced.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is head movement truly necessary?As for head movement, I've always found that a good boxing coach has a better handle on that than any other I've experienced.
Yes.Is head movement truly necessary?
As for head movement, I've always found that a good boxing coach has a better handle on that than any other I've experienced.
Nah, I think he's right. My foot is on the floor, and you're sitting on the floor, so your head is closer to my foot than it would be if you were standing up. I have to move it less distance vertically to kick you in the head, so it's less "work" (physics) to get it to smack your head and uses less energy (more physics) to get it there... so it is easier. I also don't need to worry about my lack of flexibility.
Granted, you ... could... stand up real fast, and then it'd be hard again.
Edited to add... I made my joking post above before reading the rabbit trail you guys took this thread down on pages 2 & 3. I tend to agree with DropBear on the difficulty of learning to fight a standing opponent effectively while you are on the ground. From a "time spent learning" point of view, for me, personally, my training time, which is always limited if by nothing other than the calendar, is most efficitntly used in other ways.
Can you learn "how" to do it? Sure. I can learn to walk around the house on my hands, too, but I don't get where I'm going as fast on my hands as I do on my feet, I'm just not designed that way. Y'all might be, may have knees that bend in both directions and swivel joints in your elbows, I don't know. But for me, it's Much more efficient to learn how to be defensive on he ground against a standing opponent for just long enough to either get them down with me or for me to get back up. I prefer the latter, but the former does work.
But I don't make it an art in and of itself.
You forget one thing, I am not sitting still, I continually move, looking for opprtunity, to counter, or get back to my feet
You can always let your opponent's punching arm to meet your extended arm.Yes.
You can always let your opponent's punching arm to meet your extended arm.
Instead of to dodge a punch, he uses extended
- left arm to block his opponent's right punch.
- right arm to block his opponent's left punch.
He then obtains a clinch.
Your opponent punches at you, you extend your arm into his punching path, and ...
Appologys, read the first part, and reactedGoodness... you did notice I said I was joking, right? And no, I didn't forget it.
Half of martial arts bugs me.
If you are getting punched in the face it is actually quite hard to then grapple and clinch or takedown.
It is easier if you are doing the face punching.
All good... happens. Brains are wired to react as quickly as possible... note that I had to go back and edit my postecause the joke wouldn't have been a funny thing in light of all the other posts... so it happened to me first.Appologys, read the first part, and reacted
Is head movement truly necessary?
The concern is even if you have dodged the 1st punch, the 2nd punch will still come. The moment that you can obtain a clinch, the punching game end and the wrestling game will start.I've found that the advantage of head movement over blocking in this circumstance, is them missing takes them off balance. A lot.
Are you less still when standing and being kicked?You forget one thing, I am not sitting still, I continually move, looking for opprtunity, to counter, or get back to my feet
His head moves.You can always let your opponent's punching arm to meet your extended arm.
Instead of to dodge a punch, he uses extended
- left arm to block his opponent's right punch.
- right arm to block his opponent's left punch.
He then obtains a clinch.
Your opponent punches at you, you extend your arm into his punching path, and ...
You’re using binary thinking. Movement doesn’t exclude a counter. It makes it safer.The concern is even if you have dodged the 1st punch, the 2nd punch will still come. The moment that you can obtain a clinch, the punching game end and the wrestling game will start.
IMO, to extend your arms into your opponent's punching path and "hide your head behind your arms" is so simple and logical.
When your opponent attacks you, you will have 2 options.You’re using binary thinking. Movement doesn’t exclude a counter. It makes it safer.
The concern is even if you have dodged the 1st punch, the 2nd punch will still come. The moment that you can obtain a clinch, the punching game end and the wrestling game will start.
IMO, to extend your arms into your opponent's punching path and "hide your head behind your arms" is so simple and logical.
And... when they nearly fall down, on their own... and you are able to combine that with an obviously gentle tip over so you can control the situation... looks Much Better on video than slip, block, counterpunch to face, punch-punch-punch the body, sweep the knee and jump on the back method...I've found that the advantage of head movement over blocking in this circumstance, is them missing takes them off balance. A lot.
And... when they nearly fall down, on their own... and you are able to combine that with an obviously gentle tip over so you can control the situation... looks Much Better on video than slip, block, counterpunch to face, punch-punch-punch the body, sweep the knee and jump on the back method...
Not that I've ever done it the latter way... no...
Head and foot movement can evade while closing distance. That’s pretty basic, even for me.When your opponent attacks you, you will have 2 options.
1. Dodge, remain distance, and attack back.
2. Attack him at the same time (since he moves in toward you, you don't have to move in toward him. He has done your footwork).
IMO, 1 < 2.
- You attack, I dodge, and attack you back.
- You then dodge, and attack me back.
How many times do we have to repeat the same process over and over?
Why not just
- You attack, I also attack you back at the same time.
Either you knock me down, or I take you down right at that moment.