sgtmac_46
Senior Master
You're confused about the standard.....the standard isn't 'NO RISK!' of injury.....resisting arrest carries a risk of injury........the force used was in proportion with the resistance offered......strikes to the legs carry no real risk of DEATH or SERIOUS physical injury......and if you don't understand the definition of 'SERIOUS' physical injury, that may be where the confusion lay. Serious physical injury is 'Brian Damage' or a ruptured spleen.the second one is a repeat with a little commentary. i watched it again, & i don't really think that a club to the knee carries no risk of injury.
Pain, bruising, soft tissue damage are not considered 'serious' physical injury, and are considered acceptable risks incurred when actively resisting arrest.
What the public wants is 'Pretty on video force'.......that's an asinine standard. The rational standard is 'Objectively Reasonable' force......and that is the standard the courts apply, that you refer to as 'Giving the officers a slap on the wrist'........apparently 'Objectively reasonable based on the totality of the circumstances' offends some folks.
Last edited: