I agree you don't stand and trade punches out of a low stance, but I think you can use it in a fight.
Agreed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree you don't stand and trade punches out of a low stance, but I think you can use it in a fight.
I wouldn't dream of adopting a low stance in that situation. As I have often said if you would use that stance when a guy challenges you in the pub then fair enough.Yes, that much is true, but what I meant is adopting a medium to low stance as your default posture when facing an opponent. Most of the forms and applications I have been taught are executed with such stance and we are taught to move on and out of positions swiftly while maintaining low stance.
Awesome lower body strength, that I would call 'centre', is nothing to do with low stance. If you low stance gives you added leg strength then call it a side benefit.Training in low stances really help to develop awesome lower body strength, my teacher is practically immovable, however, once he moves it is deceptively quick, even when maintaining a low stance. Seems like a viable way to move when facing an opponent, that's why I'm not sure why it is not used more widely.
You are talking sport. You can do what you like there. Stances were in kata a hundred years before there was competition.My suspicion is keeping a low stance would deter your opponent from going for a take down in the first place.. unless you're already in a clinch. This is also one reason i suspect, that so many fights in MMA go to the ground so easily...
Wrong in all respects. Low stances when used as part of a technique are either static or transitional into another static position, and the move into and out of those stances needs to be fluid. Absolutely nothing to do with leg strength. If your teacher tells you that that is the main purpose of low stances, I would suggest you find a new teacher.I do not know which MA teaches the low stance as a purely static position.. as far as I know, low stances are not supposed to be any more static than high, standing stances. In fact, static low stances are only practiced to strengthen and condition your thigh and lower leg muscles to the degree that they can move in a fluid manner even while maintaining a low stance.
Harsh, but a little true.I wouldn't dream of adopting a low stance in that situation. As I have often said if you would use that stance when a guy challenges you in the pub then fair enough.
Awesome lower body strength, that I would call 'centre', is nothing to do with low stance. If you low stance gives you added leg strength then call it a side benefit.
You are talking sport. You can do what you like there. Stances were in kata a hundred years before there was competition.
Wrong in all respects. Low stances when used as part of a technique are either static or transitional into another static position, and the move into and out of those stances needs to be fluid. Absolutely nothing to do with leg strength. If your teacher tells you that that is the main purpose of low stances, I would suggest you find a new teacher.
:asian:
I do think his teacher tells him not to be static; so, we may have simple terminology issue here.Harsh, but a little true.
I do think his teacher tells him not to be static; so, we may have simple terminology issue here.
Ma Gui advocated a rigorous approach to training with a heavy emphasis on developing extraordinary lower leg strength. According to current Ma Gui Style Baguazhang teacher Li Baohua, "The Baguazhang passed on by Ma Gui emphasizes the lower basin walking, so his lower legs were extremely thick. Lower basin walking means that the strength of the whole body is concentrated on the lower legs and feet, using the hidden strength of the bones and tendons. Ma Gui's lower legs were so developed that the shin bone was completely protected by tissue. He often had Liu Wanchuan (Li Baohua's grandmaster) look at his shins, and would occasionally allow people to hit them with wooden or iron staffs."[SUP][8][/SUP] Ma Gui would often wear a sand filled jacket on his body or a sand filled belt around his waist or legs for strength training and would also attach ropes on nearby trees to make a netting, and then train under the netting. The netting would ensure that he stayed low.[SUP][11][/SUP] Ma Gui was also known to demonstrate his strength by Bagua circle walking underneath a three foot high table.[SUP][2][/SUP] While an impressive feat, the majority of Ma Gui's leg training was not done through walking at such an extremely low level, but rather was cultivated by countless hours of his system's "bear walking:" slow concentrated circle-walking in a horse stance that dramatically transforms the large tendon lines from neck to feet and strengthens the entire body.[SUP][12][/SUP][SUP][13][/SUP][SUP][14][/SUP]
Ma Gui was most famous for his devastating fighting technique called the "zhibi wanda"—a wrist strike with a straightened arm.[SUP][7][/SUP] According to third generation Yin Style Baguazhang master He Puren, "In order to practice his wrist-striking, he would do a press-up style exercise that involved him falling forward onto the floor onto the back of his wrists and then springing back up to a standing position, which he would practice repeatedly and could do with ease. He had bested many famous masters using only his wrist-striking. You couldn't touch his body, if you did it felt like being electrocuted."[SUP][15][/SUP] To further strengthen this technique Ma was also known to practice with ten-pound iron rings on each wrist.[SUP][7][/SUP]
Are low stances, which are the core elements in many traditional styles, actually useful in free for all fighting/sparring? Are the more contemporary stand up stances simple more mobile or are they intrinsically less stable (more prone to takedowns), can low stances be a viable alternative?
Sounds like questions for your instructor.
Sounds like questions for your instructor.
Ah! Now you are starting to think. That may well be the first step along a different path.And just to add.
I did Tae Kwon Do in my teens and I am nominally a Black Belt (Yes I know that's not saying much). In TKD we did our Poomsae in low stances, but in sparring there's hardly a hint of it. Didn't think much about it then, but now it's really puzzling to me why we would do our forms in a way that had little relevance to how we actually fought.
In general, however, I'd say that it's pretty safe to say that regardless of the art, the low stances practiced in forms build flexibility and strength in the thighs and hips. That's important in any stance. And of course if you were to, say, duck under a high strike, the practice moving in the low stance would be useful.
More specific applications would depend on your system, of course.
When you think of you fighting stance, a very static image should appear in your head, but you don't have to be static with your fighting stance.Yup, it's a terminology issue, I don't disagree with what he said its just more of a semantics problem. I'm not going to try to be defensive about it.