Oily Dragon
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
- Messages
- 3,257
- Reaction score
- 1,651
Yes.That look like a horse stance to me. What's the weight distributation?
- 30/70?
- 40/60?
- 50/50?
Are both feet completely on the ground?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.That look like a horse stance to me. What's the weight distributation?
- 30/70?
- 40/60?
- 50/50?
Are both feet completely on the ground?
It's right there in the hanzi, truly.It’s not really “soft” more like supple or wrapping if I understand correctly.
Gone are the days where a person says "kung fu technique does this" Sometimes you just have to show how it works through application.Well, you'd be surprised. People don't like hearing they don't know something. I got an awful lot of grief after a previous video where I described using Xie Xing as a strike. I was categorically told by a number of people that it was a throw and nothing else...
It's probably from the kung fu world. Accepting a new application for an existing technique can be "fighting words." The reason is that you have teachers and "masters" who have taught things and have in their mind that they know everything, so anything new from someone who knows less hurts their ego. Not all of them are like that, but there are some out there who have that attitude where someone who knows less can't "teach the teacher." They do not believe in "Student learns from teacher and sometimes Teacher learns from student."Was that on this forum?
Oh so that's the Unicorn Stance. I always wondered about that stance.1. Horse stance
2. Bow arrow stance
3. Striking tiger stance
4. Empty stance
5. Twisting stance
6. 4-6 stance
7. Golden rooster stance
8. 7 stars stance
9. Monkey stance
View attachment 28855
View attachment 28856
It's also called monkey stance.Oh so that's the Unicorn Stance. I always wondered about that stance.
I have learned as much from my students as much as anything else. I am grateful for my opportunity to teach them because they have taught me so much. They can pose questions I never thought of. They help to continue learning and growing. I have one who is already eclipsing me in several parts of the workout. He makes me so proud because he started martial arts training with me about 6 or 7 years ago.It's probably from the kung fu world. Accepting a new application for an existing technique can be "fighting words." The reason is that you have teachers and "masters" who have taught things and have in their mind that they know everything, so anything new from someone who knows less hurts their ego. Not all of them are like that, but there are some out there who have that attitude where someone who knows less can't "teach the teacher." They do not believe in "Student learns from teacher and sometimes Teacher learns from student."
I've been personally chewed out by a kung fu teacher who told me I didn't know what I was talking about when it comes to low stance and then he went on his rant about his coaching experience . It can be brutal at times. The best way I've found to deal with this is to simple show the application. Find a sparring partner and do the actual technique in sparring. If you can do that then you shut down a lot of nonsense.
Even though my Sigung was Chinese he would tell us we don’t need to know the Chinese names because we don’t live there and we aren’t able to speak cantonese anyway. I do wish I had learned it though.Oh so that's the Unicorn Stance. I always wondered about that stance.
Am I incorrect? You are the expert in this arena, I defer to your definition. I want to know I understand that correctly or do not. I use it and can do it, but I am generally somebody that can do more than I understand.It's right there in the hanzi, truly.
This is why we may still don't know what Yao Bu is.don’t need to know the Chinese names ...
You can still learn.Even though my Sigung was Chinese he would tell us we don’t need to know the Chinese names because we don’t live there and we aren’t able to speak cantonese anyway. I do wish I had learned it though.
If you know what a 'inner hook" is, why do you want to learn the chinese name "得合 De He", or the Japanese name "大内刈 Ouchi Gari"?You can still learn.
I totally agree with this. I know my school butchered the language. Trying to repeat what is heard vs Trying to repeat what is heard when someone is there to correct errors. If we said a term incorrectly then it just got worse because no one was there to correct us.Even use the Chinese term, many instructors still use it wrong.
It depends on where you find it, like KFW pointed out.Am I incorrect? You are the expert in this arena, I defer to your definition. I want to know I understand that correctly or do not. I use it and can do it, but I am generally somebody that can do more than I understand.
Now you understand why I stay up late at night studying 1,000 year old Asian symbols, alongside the styles themselves.I totally agree with this. I know my school butchered the language. Trying to repeat what is heard vs Trying to repeat what is heard when someone is there to correct errors. If we said a term incorrectly then it just got worse because no one was there to correct us.
Thank you!It depends on where you find it, like KFW pointed out.
Every little hanzi is actually a composite of several indie scriptural themes. In the southern traditions, you have gong, yao, bik, jik, fan,etc corresponding to hard, soft, sending, crowding, sending, splitting.
The yao (Cantonese for soft, supple) concept is differentiated from gong (hard) in the same way yin and yang are (in fact, gong is yang, yao is yin), but in practice since you are doing these movements isotonically in the fist sets, it's never 100% one or the other. There are a bunch of kuen poems about this along the lines of "hard but not too hard, soft but not too soft".
The Yao step (bu) from changquan probably isn't related to the southern Yao (southern Shaolin bridge), but I was curious if there was a connection. Doesn't seem to be a lot of material out there on the Yao Bu (as Damien pointed out, often this stuff is just taught as-is the way it was passed down).
Thank you!This is why we may still don't know what Yao Bu is.
To use the Chinese name, sometime it may cause more confusing. For example the Chinese wrestling "inner hook" is called "得合 De He". 95% of the Chinese won't know what's the meaning of "得合 De He" because it's Mongolian name.
Even use the Chinese names, many instructors still use it wrong.
For example:
Correct - Taiji "well fed tiger move back to mountain" (饱 Bao).
Wrong - Taiji "carry tiger back to mountain" (抱 Bao).
The same pronunciation "饱 Bao" and "抱 Bao" has been used by the wrong word. It makes no logic sense that anyone would want to carry a tiger back to mountain.
Correct - Taiji "Shoulder extend to arm" (肩).
Wrong - Taiji "Move arm like fan" (扇).
2 Chinese characters 肩 and 扇 look alike in written and were mis-used by many Taiji teachers.
You're welcome.Thank you!
I appreciate these things more than words can express. Thanks again. Often, when I would question whether I was doing something correctly, my Sifu would say “don’t worry if you are right or wrong, you are wrong”. So I just assume I’m wrong and look for the right, easier that way.You're welcome.
I was reading the other thread and remembering how many silly tiffs I've waded into with kung Fu students over pronunciation. Which is why when you ask if you're wrong, my general response is going to be "na". It takes time and effort to figure this stuff out, just like actually learning a foreign language. First time i said "hanzee" instead of "hanza" to a pretty Hakka girl, I felt so stupid until I corrected myself and her eyes lit up with recognition.
Like, Siu Nim vs Siu Lim. Same exact thing one is mainstream Cantonese, the other is southern Min native to specific areas of Fujian, Taiwan etc.
But try telling that to a rabid Wing Chun lunatic whose first language was English. Talk about an empty your cup situation. I've been lectured so many times (by students, not teachers). I got used to checking my answers . No offense intended to rabid Wing Chun crowd, btw.
There is no right or wrong, but trade off.“don’t worry if you are right or wrong, you are wrong”.