Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Early on in people's training, when they step back, they are doing just that...stepping back as opposed to yielding to the force of the attack, which only feeds the fire of the attacker by giving him space.
If they learn how to pivot and dissolve an attack by yielding to it, then if they are overwhelmed by their opponent's force, or caught off guard, then their step back will be yielding back, which still keeps them in close proximity to their attacker, as the opponent's attack is supplying the force of how much to step.
An active step back simply gives the attacker more space to do what he wants to do.
So dissolve force by turning and if necessary ride the force back while always maintaining forward intent (spring).
Of course if you are tuning/pivoting ....moving "back" is actually moving diagonally or even laterally to your attacker's energy, so in fact you are side-stepping or "off-lining" and getting an angle on your opponent. And that's very useful.
In our VT we call that "crab-step".
Just Chi Sao.
Guys, take a look at the following. It's an idea I posted on another forum, but I'd be interested in the responses of folks over here.
We've all heard about old school bouts in Hong Kong and on the mainland fought on top of tables. And of course there is the cool, if unrealistic, table top fight scene in the movie Ip Man II. Or the one in Prodigal Son. My old sifu spoke of training chi-sau that way, and from time to time we've all seen demos like that -- using strong square tables something like heavy-duty card tables, ....not tippy, round restaurant tables like in the IP Man movie, of course. Well, reading the following bit on another forum got me wondering, "Why don't we set up actual competitions based on this?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean66
Sifu WKL: Some parts of the Wing Chun style are very useful, while others are not ideally suited to certain situations. All styles have their benefits and disadvantage. Say, Wing Chun can be used with great effect when you only have small space or fight at close range. Like the predecessors, when they exchanged skills it was on a very small platform. So back then you could not step too much backwards, so the platform made you have to keep a close distance.
Personally, I'd really like to see competitons set up like this. Set up a small, low platform about 5 ft. by 5 ft., or even a bit bigger, say 2 meters on a side, and have opponents start from opposite corners. You could use kicking, punching, elbows, knees, throws, or grappling, but if you go over the side, you lose points. If both competitors go over, you'd reset on top. It could be done safely using low platforms ...perhaps raised 18 inches or 50 cm off a floor padded with mats. Having such a small floor-space with no ropes or netting to lean on would definitely change the fighting dynamics. It would be challenging and dramatic, and it would showcase the type of close fighting situation WC evolved to fight.
Has anybody actually promoted open competitions anything like this? I'm thinking WC might earn some real respect if they did. Any thoughts?