RRouuselot
Master of Arts
Anybody ever heard of these guys???
http://www.shaolin-do.com/pages/history.shtml
What is your opinon on them?
http://www.shaolin-do.com/pages/history.shtml
What is your opinon on them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never heard of this. I do see a school on that site near me. Maybe I will check them out to see what's up.RRouuselot said:Anybody ever heard of these guys???
http://www.shaolin-do.com/pages/history.shtml
What is your opinon on them?
RRouuselot said:Anybody ever heard of these guys???
http://www.shaolin-do.com/pages/history.shtml
What is your opinon on them?
:rofl: I actually laughed out loud at that one!!archmagician said:I think 7starmantis just applied a chin na lock on this thread!!! LMAO!!!
What seems kind of strange to me is that they use Japanese words and wear Japanses type Gi (with LOTS of patches)in their Chinese "art"....also I guess you don't really need to train at one of their schools to be a member:RHD said:Shaolin Do...
:toilclaw:
This is one of those threads where if I say what I really think, I'm going to piss some people off. All I can say is this: Is Shaolin Do Chinese martial arts? Kind of( :idunno: ). Is it capable of producing good martial artists? As well as any art( :asian: ), it's really up to the student after all. Would I recommend it to someone seeking to learn CMA? No.
Mike
The application asks for the name of your teacher and your rank, so maybe you do have to be in training...I'll try to find out. I can understand why you might be creeped, but it's not like you're buying a belt or anything. You're pretty much signing up for the newsletter and getting discounts on seminars and tournaments.RRouuselot said:also I guess you don't really need to train at one of their schools to be a member:
there are 2 "red flags" for me. Organizations that allow you to join via the Internet or by mail allows give me the creeps.
Xequat said:RHD, I'm not sure what you mean by "fringe" CMA.
Agreed. About twenty years ago, I ran into a guy who claimed that he was going to create a style by combining Wing Chun and Taekwondo. His reasoning was that since Wing Chun has great punches, and Taekwondo has great kicks, putting them together would make a superior martial art. I pointed out to him that the two arts' respective strategies would conflict, and he would wind up with bad Wing Chun or bad Taekwondo (as it turned out, it was just bad, period.)RHD said:What I'm getting at here is that it's so very un-CMA like to have that many forms, from completely different strategies and backgrounds, and expect to produce an effective fighting method from them.
I call those kinds of styles Cuisine Art styles like that blender thingy.....add a little of this a little of that and you get a whole lot of garbage.Randy Strausbaugh said:Agreed. About twenty years ago, I ran into a guy who claimed that he was going to create a style by combining Wing Chun and Taekwondo. His reasoning was that since Wing Chun has great punches, and Taekwondo has great kicks, putting them together would make a superior martial art. I pointed out to him that the two arts' respective strategies would conflict, and he would wind up with bad Wing Chun or bad Taekwondo (as it turned out, it was just bad, period.)
As for Shaolin-Do, a central Ohio school of the style has dropped the "Do" and replaced the belts with colored "T" shirts indicating their rank (or at least they did at the Asian Festival in Columbus last summer). Maybe the gis and belts were catching flack from the CMA community. Just a guess on my part :idunno: .