That short term relief is someone’s child, someone’s daughter, someone’s parents who survive because of sticking plaster fixes.
It’s not a refusal, it’s a
economic decision; it’s too costly and therefore vote-losing. This is how governments think.
Jesus
was a bit too macho…all that carpentry and bread-breaking. What about Neil Armstrong? What about Amal Clooney? How about a ‘famous sporting personality who has never been involved in a financial or sexual scandal’ (well
I don’t know!

)
There may be kernel of truth in what you say, but certain chinless idiots take it too far.
The NHS is overloaded by idiots who refuse vaccines because they will ‘allow their data to be stolen by Bill Gates’

Ask my hospital consultant wife.
Do you think pre-historic humans were pair bonded in male/female configuration. It was coitus, a bit of post-natal care and then onto the next conquest. This type family you describe is a recent judeo-christian construct and look how nasty that lot were.
A kernel of truth extrapolated to a conspiratorial narrative. Diets and exercise, yes, but humans take the easy route; pizza, Ant and Dec and Ozempic and cfillers. Again this is far too expensive for governments to role out.
Yes indeed, and people who can’t even cook basic meals. The number of healthy people in my gym who chug energy drinks thinking it’s fine because they’re doing a few curls.
Long term interventions
are the answer but you have to understand human nature and the resistance they put up to change. They choose ease, comfort, stabbing and the status quo over hard exercise, calorie restriction and discussing their issues over a coffee with their rival gang members.