BrandonLucas
3rd Black Belt
There is no doubt of the rush you get when competing...and I can understand how that could be addictive for some people. I know I love the whole experience of an open tournement...everything from the token irate parent(s) to the token "mystery school" that always shows up that no one's ever heard of and everyone watches warrily.
What I don't understand is the reasons as to why someone would almost forsake the SD side of the art to concentrate on the sport side. There are people who know the difference between the SD and sport side, and then there are people who think the sport side is an SD side, like exile was talking about.
There should be a difference between the tools used to win a competition with rules and the tools used to win a fight with no rules. Alot of people have a hard time telling them apart.
I've known a couple of guys that went around saying that they were blackbelts and could take anyone at any time...and they tried a few times...both of them were from an ATA TKD school (no offense to any ATA'ers out there)...but this ATA school had no contact sparring. And by no contact sparring, I seriously mean that they had no contact. Any techniques were performed 4 - 6 inches away from their opponent. It's only fair to say that they had nice technique, in terms of aesthetics, but they didn't understand their applications or how it felt to be truly hit.
Needless to say that the 2 guys didn't have a good reputation around school...not because they would actually pick fights....but more because they would pick the fights and then lose them. Everytime.
Oh, sure, they were great point sparrers. I would see them at a few of the tournements I would go to in the area, and they would always place either 1st or 2nd in sparring...I even lost to one of them once...but they absolutely did not understand the SD side of TKD at all. Not only that, but their attitudes were competitive in a non-healthy way.
What I don't understand is the reasons as to why someone would almost forsake the SD side of the art to concentrate on the sport side. There are people who know the difference between the SD and sport side, and then there are people who think the sport side is an SD side, like exile was talking about.
There should be a difference between the tools used to win a competition with rules and the tools used to win a fight with no rules. Alot of people have a hard time telling them apart.
I've known a couple of guys that went around saying that they were blackbelts and could take anyone at any time...and they tried a few times...both of them were from an ATA TKD school (no offense to any ATA'ers out there)...but this ATA school had no contact sparring. And by no contact sparring, I seriously mean that they had no contact. Any techniques were performed 4 - 6 inches away from their opponent. It's only fair to say that they had nice technique, in terms of aesthetics, but they didn't understand their applications or how it felt to be truly hit.
Needless to say that the 2 guys didn't have a good reputation around school...not because they would actually pick fights....but more because they would pick the fights and then lose them. Everytime.
Oh, sure, they were great point sparrers. I would see them at a few of the tournements I would go to in the area, and they would always place either 1st or 2nd in sparring...I even lost to one of them once...but they absolutely did not understand the SD side of TKD at all. Not only that, but their attitudes were competitive in a non-healthy way.