B
BaktoBasics
Guest
Hi to all the Wing Chunners. I think WC has lots to offer so I've decided to stick with it. However, I have heard some negative things about my current method.
I have current access to the system developed under William Cheung. However, I also have access to the system develped under Wong Shun Leung. Both schools have the students of these masters teaching. Oh, I also have access to Dana Wong (a student of William Cheung, but, he has seemed to "move on", so to speak).
Having said that, does anyone know what "method" may be better?
Anyone know what the differences are?
I hear they differ and the schools are in contant conflict with one another in relation to the teaching of WC - why?
Anyone train under these people? (in Melbourne, Australia).
Anyone trained under both? If so, which did you prefer?
The current schools seems abit to commercial. Any comments?
Thanks very much. WC is great and I want to ensure I have access to the "right stuff".
I have current access to the system developed under William Cheung. However, I also have access to the system develped under Wong Shun Leung. Both schools have the students of these masters teaching. Oh, I also have access to Dana Wong (a student of William Cheung, but, he has seemed to "move on", so to speak).
Having said that, does anyone know what "method" may be better?
Anyone know what the differences are?
I hear they differ and the schools are in contant conflict with one another in relation to the teaching of WC - why?
Anyone train under these people? (in Melbourne, Australia).
Anyone trained under both? If so, which did you prefer?
The current schools seems abit to commercial. Any comments?
Thanks very much. WC is great and I want to ensure I have access to the "right stuff".