Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this subject is as old as the cheese that's sitting in my fridge.
first off, there are two types of fighting...
wing chun for self defense "in the street".
wing chun for competition "in the ring".
they require completely different fighting strategies. so to answer the original question, first you have to ask, "which type of fighting are we talking about"?
the answer has nothing to do with "rules in the ring", or "i can eye gouge you if you grapple me" or anything else of that nature.
the answer is really really simple..it has to do with "closing the gap". this is the main reason wing chun fails "in the ring", because they are not taught how to get close to someone who doesn't let you get close to them.
but "in the street", it's another story, because you don't have to "close the gap", why? because your opponent "closes the gap" for you. so you don't even have to move an inch, this is why wing chun works "in the street".
i talk about this subject at my website, check it out at the link below...
http://www.thechinaboxer.com/2009/09/05/closing-the-gap/
I'm not putting down other ma people, since I love ALL ma.
But the trouble stems from bubble heads -- what I call pepsi & popcorn mentality -- thinking that the ultimate 'testing' ground for a fighting method, is in a sport environment. If it doesn't do well in a ring, then it's rubbish. Well, I'm just turning it around. If it doesn't do well when your life depends on it, then it's rubbish.
If you think wing chun people can't fight, than that's fine. I have no problem with that. But I for one know that your assumption isn't based on real life experience, but on what you see on tv.
Funny, my mum used to believe WWF WTF wrestling was the ultimate fighting method, lol. So did all the other gullible audiences munching on their popcorn, drinking their pepsi.
Unless someone wants to take up my offer to test themselves, then I'm not wasting another precious minute on this pointless topic.
Where most"WC" people run into trouble is they are tunnel visioned. They train hard I'm sure, but only against their own style. My old si-fu referred to this as 'incest'.
Chunners are not the only ones guilty of this. Back when I studied Southern Shaolin I saw TKD people who had never experienced another style of fighter who were dumbfounded when we grabbed their arm and swept their leg. Most boxers spar other boxers, etc.
My WT group is comprised of a bunch of old Shaolin guys like me, so while we train WT exclusively now for the past 14 years or so, we are not thrown for a loop when we see a spinning back kick or a hook puch. Some of our guys that have not trained in other styles do have a tougher time "thinking outside the box" but that's where the groups previous MA experience helps out. We've have/had in addition to Shaoliners, BJJ guys, boxers, wrestlers, kenpo, TKD, krav maga. yada yada in our group so when we practice lat sao it's not just incest, we go outside the family.
You've never played Judo have you?
I dont think WC people cant fight, I have never said that!
My point is that it is limited. Sure we can all talk about "oo oo in the ring its not like out in der street" and yeah there is some truth to that BUT if the only way you can validate your art is by getting killed then there is something wrong isnt there?
This thing about range that chinaboxer has brought up is an odd thing to say IMO. Many arts thrive on closing the gap as mentioned in mty last post Judoka love to get contact.
Agreed, all MA styles can fall into this. One of the most amazing learning experiences I have had in MA over the years was being part of a group of martial artists form different styles (Shaolin, Mantis, TKD, Aikido, kempo, etc), several years ago, that got together about one a week just to spar. That was a very cool learning experience and at times a bit of an eye opener. I got one hell of a SPM smack down out on me there :EG:
Check here he is not just Wing Chun
The ring can be equally as limited though and I am not ready to jump on the lets all go hop in the ring and prove our worth band wagon. Nor am I condoning go out and start a street fight either.
There are 2 general versions of Sanshou (Sanda) and that is sport and non-sport but there are 2 versions within non-sport; civilian and Police/Military. Sport Sanshou, (see Cung Le) can and has proved itself in the ring time and time again but very few Police/Miltary practitioners will jump into the ring to fight with all they have been trained to do it is simply against the rules. They will jump in from time to time in the sports venue but they have to change their attitude about the fight and take away some of what they train. However just because a person that trains the police/military version does not jump into the ring to prove his ability does not mean he cannot fight or that he has any lack of skill or is unable to defend him/herself, they are pretty competent fighters actually. And it is not because of any eye gouge. Punch emĀ in the chest, rip out their heart, show it to emĀ before they die and toss it in the bean dip training, it is simply training and training hard and I can tell you form experience that training hard in that version of Sanshou hurtsĀ a lot from time to time.
And there are a multitude of arts that like to close the gap, Taiji and Xingyi being 2 of them, BUTĀ .. they do not approach it in the same way and Wing Chun is different in its approach as well and I can only assume that Judo has its own approach too.
I think between what yak sao posted about tunnel vision and chinaboxer's post on not being taught how to get close to someone who doesn't let you get close to them and not having or forgetting the basics of wing Chun (which may be in another of his posts) is very much part of the issue for more arts than Wing Chun. certainly more arts than many MA practitioners are willing to admit. And I will add for some it is a lack of wanting to train properly because damn that hurts.
I do know there are Wing Chun practitioners that can fight but just because one trains Wing Chun does not necessarily mean they can fight and just because they don't jump into a ring to prove it does not mean they can't, which is no different that any other martial art on the planet.
And for the record (and a bit of irony) For a long time I have felt that a combination of Wing Chun and Judo would be a pretty damn effective combination
I'm not putting down other ma people, since I love ALL ma.
But the trouble stems from bubble heads -- what I call pepsi & popcorn mentality -- thinking that the ultimate 'testing' ground for a fighting method, is in a sport environment. If it doesn't do well in a ring, then it's rubbish. Well, I'm just turning it around. If it doesn't do well when your life depends on it, then it's rubbish.
If you think wing chun people can't fight, than that's fine. I have no problem with that. But I for one know that your assumption isn't based on real life experience, but on what you see on tv.
Funny, my mum used to believe WWF WTF wrestling was the ultimate fighting method, lol. So did all the other gullible audiences munching on their popcorn, drinking their pepsi.
Unless someone wants to take up my offer to test themselves, then I'm not wasting another precious minute on this pointless topic.
Nobody every said sports were THE ultimate testing ground, just the most realistic that we have. I will say MMA is the best testing ground that we have today.
What area are you from?
AND THIS WASNT EVEN IN DER STR33t
D'ya get it??? NOT EVEN UNDER NORMAL SPARRING CONDITIONS WAS IT EFFECTIVE......
All I can say is your mileage may vary.Hi Si Ji do you have any other MA experience?
I can only go on my own experince of MAs and ts a similar story to many people I have talked to.
I studied WC intently for years andgot as far a junior instructor level. i then decided to test it out against other styles. To date I have been beaten by a number of Judo players, a growing number of Arnis players, BJJ players and comletely F@*king trashed by a boxer (on a number of occasions).
Now dont get me wrong I did on occasion come out on top but that was almost always against people who hadnt been training long!!!!
I aint no fool I realised that what I had been training in for years just wasnt as effective as I thought when pressure tested. I do mean pressure tested.
AND THIS WASNT EVEN IN DER STR33t
D'ya get it??? NOT EVEN UNDER NORMAL SPARRING CONDITIONS WAS IT EFFECTIVE
Phew rant over and that said I have learnt some invaluable lessons from WC that have and will always be part of my MA training, Chi Sau to name one.......
And another thing if somebody says "well there are some d34dly techniques that you wouldnt do when sparring" you ar making a childish assumption that people dont know how to counter being poked in the face or getting to positions where you could eat their goolies.
Here we go again,..... :lol:
Just sometimes it gets my back up when I here people saying silly things about any style really and Wing Chun seems to be a particularly bad style for this kind of thing.
Hon, many, many folks claim that the ring is the "ultimate" testing ground for an arts functionality. Hell, It's been proclaimed that wing chun is no good in the street because it hasn't won a UFC championship! lol!
By the way, the word "ultimate" really means that last. as in extinct. The only one left. so, therefore the "ultimate fighter" is the last man standing?! the best of all?
ha!
sigh. Sorry, don't mean to pick a fight, again. lol!
ChiSau King, Wing Chun just isn't gonna have that kind of reconition, and a good thing too. It's traditional for WC/WT to be known like it is. It was a "secret" art for a long time durning the Chinese revolution. Something to get folks to be effective fighters in a short amount of time, but taught on a one on one basis if not a very small amount of students at a time.
It was never designed for teaching large classes, making a bunch of money (although folks have figured out how to do that. lol!) or for being a "mainstream" form of fighting.
Wing Chun is for the fighters,
"Long live the fighters!"
Poor Uke, out of curiosity, how much more experienced were the other fighters compared to yourself, and how fast did you progress to junior instructor level?
Sad to say, but not all Wing Chun schools are the same. as is said many times, the ones that produce good fighters are generally not advertising much. It's a very close knit group. Some comercialized schools are more visable, but because of comercialization, the teaching is adapted to the larger class sizes, so some times students don't get the kind of attention they generally need. (although there is at least one commercial school i know of that does produce good fighters) Wing Chun isn't an easy art to grasp, it takes a lot of knowledge and understanding to make it work, not just knowing the motions.
Wing Chun is very effective if one finds the right sifu and also if the student is talented.
It was my experience that sparring TKD, karateka, boxers, "street fighters", and a few escrima guys, that Wing Chun is very effective against single and multiple opponents.
Train against other styles is good, so we can see our own limitations in understanding. Before I liked training in other styles too, and also started to make my own style (mili quan), but the more I understand when comparing the different styles I have learned, it was the foundation of Wing Chun that let me understand how other styles work, and to disect and find the essence of the other style's movement... anyway sorry for starting to get off topic, but yeah, good fighter or not... really depends on the quality of the sifu (coach) and the capability of the student (fighter)