Unjustified premise. False conclusion.
Rule #1 of guns: Assume every gun is loaded until you have personally confirmed that it is not.
Therefore, unless you are prepared to demonstrate that you own that specific gun, you cannot assume it is not loaded. And even if you do own it, I, and everyone else reading this, would still need to assume it is loaded.
Conclusion: Dirty Dog would make damn sure it's loaded.
Assuming every gun is loaded until you have personally confirmed that it is not actually supports the premise that some guns are unloaded. Sorry, Charlie.
Unless you're suggesting something like Schrodinger's cat, where the gun is simultaneously both loaded and unloaded at the same time, until someone confirms its state.
But even then, we have already established that this gun is unloaded, meaning, we have confirmed that it is in an unloaded state (i.e., we have opened the box and seen that the cat is, in fact, dead). So, to catch up:
Premise: A gun can be either loaded or unloaded.
Premise: This gun is unloaded.
Premise:
@Dirty Dog would never have an unloaded gun.
Conclusion:
@Dirty Dog would never have this gun.
If we examine premise 3, I think we could actually challenge that, too. I mean, are your guns always loaded? Do you ever unload them, for example, to clean them or to discharge them at the firing range? If so, then, this isn't quite right. It would be more accurate to say that your guns are always stored in a loaded state, though there are times when they are unloaded.
Just saying, it's a cool gun, but in this discussion, where guns aren't loaded, I think you argued yourself out of it.